www.justsecurity.org/120568/carib...
More House GOP members should follow his lead.
More House GOP members should follow his lead.
www.wsj.com/politics/nat...
www.wsj.com/politics/nat...
They are parking some of our most lethal warships off the coast of Venezuela and sending thousands of service members to the region.
And we're supposed to believe this is about blowing up speedboats?
Remember, the Admiral overseeing bombings just resigned. Did he think the orders are illegal?
newrepublic.com/article/2032...
theintercept.com/2025/11/14/b...
theintercept.com/2025/11/14/b...
“It’s legal Mad Libs. They’re throwing all these terms and concepts at the wall, but there’s no real content or substance behind them.”
In a memo promising legal immunity for those who kill alleged drug traffickers, the Trump administration floated an unusual legal theory.
theintercept.com/2025/11/14/b...
“It’s legal Mad Libs. They’re throwing all these terms and concepts at the wall, but there’s no real content or substance behind them.”
Many differences between targeting (alleged) drugs on these boats and ISIS petroleum—including it seems physical control.
Many differences between targeting (alleged) drugs on these boats and ISIS petroleum—including it seems physical control.
www.reuters.com/world/us/jus...
www.reuters.com/world/us/jus...
Fair to say that I’m deeply skeptical of claims that these strikes are lawful attacks on “revenue-generating” targets.
Accounts of a secret Justice Department memo offer a window into how administration lawyers approved the president’s desired course of action.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/13/u...
Fair to say that I’m deeply skeptical of claims that these strikes are lawful attacks on “revenue-generating” targets.
Just follow orders.
That appears to be the operative rule the administration wants to establish.
“[T]he strikes were ordered consistent with the laws of armed conflict, and as such are lawful orders.
“Military personnel are legally obligated to follow lawful orders and, as such, are not subject to prosecution for following lawful orders.”
Just follow orders.
That appears to be the operative rule the administration wants to establish.
Just follow orders.
That appears to be the operative rule the administration wants to establish.
“[T]he strikes were ordered consistent with the laws of armed conflict, and as such are lawful orders.
“Military personnel are legally obligated to follow lawful orders and, as such, are not subject to prosecution for following lawful orders.”
Just follow orders.
That appears to be the operative rule the administration wants to establish.
"Military personnel are legally obligated to follow lawful orders and as such are not subject to prosecution for following lawful orders."
"Lawful orders" in this formulation being a function of what POTUS and his pliant OLC say.
www.pbs.org/newshour/sho...
"Military personnel are legally obligated to follow lawful orders and as such are not subject to prosecution for following lawful orders."
"Lawful orders" in this formulation being a function of what POTUS and his pliant OLC say.
www.pbs.org/newshour/sho...
Fair to say that I’m deeply skeptical of claims that these strikes are lawful attacks on “revenue-generating” targets.
Accounts of a secret Justice Department memo offer a window into how administration lawyers approved the president’s desired course of action.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/13/u...
Fair to say that I’m deeply skeptical of claims that these strikes are lawful attacks on “revenue-generating” targets.
Glad the USG internalized the lessons from that experience.
www.bbc.com/news/world-u...
Glad the USG internalized the lessons from that experience.
www.bbc.com/news/world-u...
www.france24.com/en/video/202...
www.france24.com/en/video/202...
“The term for premeditated killing outside of armed conflict is murder. And the Trump administration has not established that these strikes are taking place in an armed conflict.”
DOJ: US forces following orders.
“The term for premeditated killing outside of armed conflict is murder. And the Trump administration has not established that these strikes are taking place in an armed conflict.”
DOJ: US forces following orders.
Mexico reportedly announces that it will interdict suspected vessels in order to forestall further US strikes off its coasts.
elpais.com/mexico/2025-...
Mexico reportedly announces that it will interdict suspected vessels in order to forestall further US strikes off its coasts.
elpais.com/mexico/2025-...
www.state.gov/releases/202...
www.state.gov/releases/202...
For the first time, the Venezuelans arrested in a Chicago raid are telling their stories.