July 28, 2025 at 7:20 PM
July 28, 2025 at 7:16 PM
Gotta be a humiliation kink how Americans whine about American government.
Disgusting how you guys elected shit and wallow in it now.
bsky.app/profile/came...
Disgusting how you guys elected shit and wallow in it now.
bsky.app/profile/came...
July 28, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Gotta be a humiliation kink how Americans whine about American government.
Disgusting how you guys elected shit and wallow in it now.
bsky.app/profile/came...
Disgusting how you guys elected shit and wallow in it now.
bsky.app/profile/came...
𝒮𝑜𝓊𝓃𝒹𝓈 𝓁𝒾𝓀𝑒 𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝑜𝓈𝓈𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇 𝐼'𝒹 𝓉𝒶𝓅 𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓂𝓎 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇.
July 11, 2025 at 9:56 PM
𝒮𝑜𝓊𝓃𝒹𝓈 𝓁𝒾𝓀𝑒 𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝑜𝓈𝓈𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇 𝐼'𝒹 𝓉𝒶𝓅 𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓂𝓎 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇.
𝑀𝓎 𝓉𝑒𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝓊𝒸𝓉𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝑒 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒻𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈.
July 11, 2025 at 9:54 PM
𝑀𝓎 𝓉𝑒𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝓊𝒸𝓉𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝑒 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒻𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈.
𝑀𝓎 𝓌𝒶𝓁𝓁𝑒𝓉 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒻𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝑜𝒻 𝒸𝓊𝓉𝑒𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓈.
July 11, 2025 at 9:52 PM
𝑀𝓎 𝓌𝒶𝓁𝓁𝑒𝓉 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒻𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝑜𝒻 𝒸𝓊𝓉𝑒𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓈.
The capacity of compartmentalising is strong with some of yous.
The definition literally means «pensioner».
Do you guys hate pensioners? You know, folks who don't have to work and live on proceeds off capital.
The definition literally means «pensioner».
Do you guys hate pensioners? You know, folks who don't have to work and live on proceeds off capital.
Many people you know who don't have to work for a living and live entirely on the proceeds of capital?
May 26, 2025 at 9:09 PM
The capacity of compartmentalising is strong with some of yous.
The definition literally means «pensioner».
Do you guys hate pensioners? You know, folks who don't have to work and live on proceeds off capital.
The definition literally means «pensioner».
Do you guys hate pensioners? You know, folks who don't have to work and live on proceeds off capital.
You think Labour is a party of pensioners???
"Starmer's jettisoning of members wasn't just a case of reversing the democratic gains made in the party under Corbyn, but a concerted effort at making Labour amenable to bourgeois interests - and what better way than making it financially dependent on the largesse of the rich?"
Labour's Money Woes
A small item in a week full of big stories. LabourList reported that the party's finances have plunged into the red. Actual figures weren'...
averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com
May 26, 2025 at 9:03 PM
You think Labour is a party of pensioners???
You mean pension investment funds and private stockholders?
Again, that comes down to a large majority of the population.
Again, that comes down to a large majority of the population.
May 26, 2025 at 7:46 AM
You mean pension investment funds and private stockholders?
Again, that comes down to a large majority of the population.
Again, that comes down to a large majority of the population.
Bourgeois?
Majority of Brits own their homes. There isn't many non-bourgeois people in the country.
Majority of Brits own their homes. There isn't many non-bourgeois people in the country.
May 25, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Bourgeois?
Majority of Brits own their homes. There isn't many non-bourgeois people in the country.
Majority of Brits own their homes. There isn't many non-bourgeois people in the country.
Oh it always comes down to that murderous «better» 🤭
Better for the Brits, and let Ukrainians be damned.
Better for the Brits, and let Ukrainians be damned.
May 25, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Oh it always comes down to that murderous «better» 🤭
Better for the Brits, and let Ukrainians be damned.
Better for the Brits, and let Ukrainians be damned.
Or taking your revisionism further, Britain could have left the Yanukovich scot free after shooting the protesters?
Realpolitik and very bloody, but Brits have done worse. Not entirely out of character ☺️
Realpolitik and very bloody, but Brits have done worse. Not entirely out of character ☺️
May 25, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Or taking your revisionism further, Britain could have left the Yanukovich scot free after shooting the protesters?
Realpolitik and very bloody, but Brits have done worse. Not entirely out of character ☺️
Realpolitik and very bloody, but Brits have done worse. Not entirely out of character ☺️
But tough though it is for Ukraine, it'd retain cheaper gas, uphold FTSE stocks, and luxury investment in the property market.
Pragmatically speaking, there arguably is a point in Jeremy's plan.
Pragmatically speaking, there arguably is a point in Jeremy's plan.
May 25, 2025 at 1:59 PM
But tough though it is for Ukraine, it'd retain cheaper gas, uphold FTSE stocks, and luxury investment in the property market.
Pragmatically speaking, there arguably is a point in Jeremy's plan.
Pragmatically speaking, there arguably is a point in Jeremy's plan.
Obviously it isn't up to Corbyn, or Britain as a whole to decide for Ukrainians whether peacefull executions under occupation are preferable to bombs.
May 25, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Obviously it isn't up to Corbyn, or Britain as a whole to decide for Ukrainians whether peacefull executions under occupation are preferable to bombs.
Totally, every person and collectively every country entitled to their decisions.
Maybe Corbyn's plan was right, for Britain — let Ukraine fight it out AK47 against tanks.
Maybe Corbyn's plan was right, for Britain — let Ukraine fight it out AK47 against tanks.
May 25, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Totally, every person and collectively every country entitled to their decisions.
Maybe Corbyn's plan was right, for Britain — let Ukraine fight it out AK47 against tanks.
Maybe Corbyn's plan was right, for Britain — let Ukraine fight it out AK47 against tanks.
That's a bit patronising answer to the question.
Why do you think you are better equipped to judge the future of this war than Ukrainians?
Why do you think you are better equipped to judge the future of this war than Ukrainians?
Is that what Ukrainians feel?
May 25, 2025 at 1:32 PM
That's a bit patronising answer to the question.
Why do you think you are better equipped to judge the future of this war than Ukrainians?
Why do you think you are better equipped to judge the future of this war than Ukrainians?
Long term I want to get new shoes.
May 25, 2025 at 1:29 PM
Long term I want to get new shoes.
A decade ago the russia has already occupied parts of Georgia and Ukraine.
It was already a populist malicious thing then.
It was already a populist malicious thing then.
May 25, 2025 at 1:28 PM
A decade ago the russia has already occupied parts of Georgia and Ukraine.
It was already a populist malicious thing then.
It was already a populist malicious thing then.
Is that what Ukrainians feel?
May 25, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Is that what Ukrainians feel?
Disarming Ukraine is justified by me not being paid enough?
Just cut the charade, spill it. Why did these people lobby to disarm Ukraine?
Just cut the charade, spill it. Why did these people lobby to disarm Ukraine?
May 25, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Disarming Ukraine is justified by me not being paid enough?
Just cut the charade, spill it. Why did these people lobby to disarm Ukraine?
Just cut the charade, spill it. Why did these people lobby to disarm Ukraine?
OK, so the suggestion is:
* Britain should have let the russians to exterminate Ukrainians
* Should have let the Germans to exterminate Jewish people
Because it was best? For whom was it best?
* Britain should have let the russians to exterminate Ukrainians
* Should have let the Germans to exterminate Jewish people
Because it was best? For whom was it best?
May 25, 2025 at 1:01 PM
OK, so the suggestion is:
* Britain should have let the russians to exterminate Ukrainians
* Should have let the Germans to exterminate Jewish people
Because it was best? For whom was it best?
* Britain should have let the russians to exterminate Ukrainians
* Should have let the Germans to exterminate Jewish people
Because it was best? For whom was it best?
Oh so they lobbied to disarm Ukraine to help Palestine.
How does that one work?
How does that one work?
May 25, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Oh so they lobbied to disarm Ukraine to help Palestine.
How does that one work?
How does that one work?