Sure, it's not perfect. It shouldn't be used in serious or professional contexts. But you're describing it as if it's worthless and will be forever (false)
Sure, it's not perfect. It shouldn't be used in serious or professional contexts. But you're describing it as if it's worthless and will be forever (false)
BTW where's the lie?
BTW where's the lie?
If you want to follow that line of reasoning, no source is infallible, therefore it's all bullshit.
If you want to follow that line of reasoning, no source is infallible, therefore it's all bullshit.
Can we be more constructive than that, please? I wasn't trying to ruin anyone's day when I posted that
Can we be more constructive than that, please? I wasn't trying to ruin anyone's day when I posted that
Might not be a direct fabrication of Chomsky's, but it's totally in his lane. en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Atrocit...
Might not be a direct fabrication of Chomsky's, but it's totally in his lane. en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Atrocit...