@infinata.bsky.social Just seen this - I do agree that is these dates are not firm or definitive. They will always be tentative and ambiguous, akin to the current modern scholarly understanding of antiquity in reality.

Though, would that convey that a range of 25,000-20,000 BBY is ideal to assert?

This is a keyset image, not derived from a final frame of the film.

Is that the explanation for a pretty subtle lighter region surrounding the Millennium Falcon here? Though, could just be general optical composite shenanigans.

Is a Frank Connor associated with the film photography?

Ooh okay I was not familiar with Whitear. Will research. Thank you for saving some credit scouring on my end.

Canonical reference material, specifically DK's entries within the Visual Dictionary series and materials with derive from the former, such as the various new editions of the Character Encylopedia and other sources. Some may conflate. So, this is a very interesting question on intent.

Very interesting, I completely forgot that many of these images were directly airbrushed and the artist responsible may have been working from preliminary information...

A tangent, however do you know if there are sources which outline the unit still photographers, for the Original Trilogy's films?

Or blue, rather.

I love you for it. Thank the Story Group for me.

I watched it in cinemas - did not regret getting recliner seats.

The Entity would've instituted this if it succeeded.

Oh wow, that's a fair point of physics which I did not account for in all this time - free fall and objects falling at the same rate. I'm a student of history, so the armchair (and actual) physicists will have to forgive me on this.
The magnetic aid works in tandem more perfectly than I realised...

I admittedly collect those sticker books for their niches, but hey, they give me some nice reference images sometimes.

Those wide environmental shots are rarely published in material anymore! They are nice to stare at for many minutes at a time.