Asa Dotzler
@asadotzler.com
The good lookin' guy in the back, not the beautiful woman in front.
November 11, 2025 at 10:49 PM
The good lookin' guy in the back, not the beautiful woman in front.
Another Chris Messina creation, one we didn't use :D
November 10, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Another Chris Messina creation, one we didn't use :D
November 10, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Yes! It's been a long time coming.
November 9, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Yes! It's been a long time coming.
That would be awesome. I just want a Copy button :D so I don't have to save it or C&P the URL to get the image into my clipboard.
November 9, 2025 at 10:53 PM
That would be awesome. I just want a Copy button :D so I don't have to save it or C&P the URL to get the image into my clipboard.
That's my fallback for when this gets removed :D
Every build I use that's still got it is a blessing. I feel a tinge of dread each time I go to press those shortcut keys, that it won't pop up, I'll check Bugzilla and see it's been removed for lack of use.
Every build I use that's still got it is a blessing. I feel a tinge of dread each time I go to press those shortcut keys, that it won't pop up, I'll check Bugzilla and see it's been removed for lack of use.
November 9, 2025 at 10:52 PM
That's my fallback for when this gets removed :D
Every build I use that's still got it is a blessing. I feel a tinge of dread each time I go to press those shortcut keys, that it won't pop up, I'll check Bugzilla and see it's been removed for lack of use.
Every build I use that's still got it is a blessing. I feel a tinge of dread each time I go to press those shortcut keys, that it won't pop up, I'll check Bugzilla and see it's been removed for lack of use.
Just added a follow up comment covering sentiment :D
November 9, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Just added a follow up comment covering sentiment :D
Yes, the feature is ugly and could use some design love. It's a vestige from ancient times, first appearing in nightly build 2000-05-17.
The upside to its ugliness is its existence. Had it been visible enough to get design attention, some ex-Facebook PM likely would have seen to its removal by now.
The upside to its ugliness is its existence. Had it been visible enough to get design attention, some ex-Facebook PM likely would have seen to its removal by now.
22119 - [FEATURE] View Page Info not implemented
VERIFIED (mcafee) in SeaMonkey - Page Info. Last updated 2004-11-22.
bugzilla.mozilla.org
November 9, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Yes, the feature is ugly and could use some design love. It's a vestige from ancient times, first appearing in nightly build 2000-05-17.
The upside to its ugliness is its existence. Had it been visible enough to get design attention, some ex-Facebook PM likely would have seen to its removal by now.
The upside to its ugliness is its existence. Had it been visible enough to get design attention, some ex-Facebook PM likely would have seen to its removal by now.
No. But I will now. Thank, Andy!
(4 Hugos! Amazing. I need to start paying attention to contemporary authors.)
(4 Hugos! Amazing. I need to start paying attention to contemporary authors.)
November 9, 2025 at 1:34 AM
No. But I will now. Thank, Andy!
(4 Hugos! Amazing. I need to start paying attention to contemporary authors.)
(4 Hugos! Amazing. I need to start paying attention to contemporary authors.)
Also looking at some non-series books.
:
:
November 8, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Also looking at some non-series books.
:
:
Awesome. Thanks for sharing. I did not know that and have only been following him as much as leaks through my current events filters.
November 8, 2025 at 3:00 AM
Awesome. Thanks for sharing. I did not know that and have only been following him as much as leaks through my current events filters.
Charlie Cox! Oh, wait, no ;D
He could play Matt Murdock for sure. Wonder if he could do the DD stunt work :D
He could play Matt Murdock for sure. Wonder if he could do the DD stunt work :D
November 8, 2025 at 2:59 AM
Charlie Cox! Oh, wait, no ;D
He could play Matt Murdock for sure. Wonder if he could do the DD stunt work :D
He could play Matt Murdock for sure. Wonder if he could do the DD stunt work :D
Of course take it with a grain of salt as I'm one of the people responsible for launching Firefox nightly builds :D so of course I'd be happy with them. Still, they really are solid. My last data loss issue was in 2003. There have been a few crashy builds here and there, but nothing insurmountable.
November 7, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Of course take it with a grain of salt as I'm one of the people responsible for launching Firefox nightly builds :D so of course I'd be happy with them. Still, they really are solid. My last data loss issue was in 2003. There have been a few crashy builds here and there, but nothing insurmountable.
If you do, try moving to Nightly builds. YouTube seems to ignore Nightly in its various user-hostile scripts.
(Firefox Nightly has been my default browser for over 20 years and it's been more stable than most release versions of other browsers.)
(Firefox Nightly has been my default browser for over 20 years and it's been more stable than most release versions of other browsers.)
November 7, 2025 at 10:32 PM
If you do, try moving to Nightly builds. YouTube seems to ignore Nightly in its various user-hostile scripts.
(Firefox Nightly has been my default browser for over 20 years and it's been more stable than most release versions of other browsers.)
(Firefox Nightly has been my default browser for over 20 years and it's been more stable than most release versions of other browsers.)