annahatch.bsky.social
@annahatch.bsky.social
Reposted by annahatch.bsky.social
A genuine opportunity to make a positive difference for science - accelerating discovery and communication in the life sciences. Apply to join the @asapbio.bsky.social board.
Passionate about driving positive change in science communication? We need your guidance!
asapbio.org/asapbio-seek...
@asapbio.bsky.social
@katiecorker.bsky.social
@iaincheeseman.bsky.social
@ludowaltman.bsky.social
asapbio.org/asapbio-seek...
@asapbio.bsky.social
@katiecorker.bsky.social
@iaincheeseman.bsky.social
@ludowaltman.bsky.social
ASAPbio Seeks New Board Members – ASAPbio
ASAPbio is seeking several new members for our Board of Directors to support our mission to drive positive change in science communication. Read more about
asapbio.org
August 13, 2025 at 3:21 PM
A genuine opportunity to make a positive difference for science - accelerating discovery and communication in the life sciences. Apply to join the @asapbio.bsky.social board.
Reposted by annahatch.bsky.social
"Intense backlash prompted the reinstatement of some online resources." 👉 Saying hell no has an effect when enough of us say it. Don't let people tell you that your voice doesn't matter.
SCOOP: Many of the pages that went missing on Friday from the CDC website on Friday have reappeared — in response to intense media coverage, backlash from the scientific community and concern for the public’s health.
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/03/h...
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/03/h...
‘Gender Ideology’ Ban is Already Harming Health, Experts Say (Gift Article)
Documents purged from government websites include guidelines for safe contraception and information on racial inequities in health care.
www.nytimes.com
February 3, 2025 at 9:24 PM
"Intense backlash prompted the reinstatement of some online resources." 👉 Saying hell no has an effect when enough of us say it. Don't let people tell you that your voice doesn't matter.
Reposted by annahatch.bsky.social
Current bibliographic databases like Web of Science and Scopus shape what “counts” in research & influence how researchers are assessed. Do they support innovation?
Take a look at our proposal for four criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases
upstream.force11.org/criteria-for...
Take a look at our proposal for four criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases
upstream.force11.org/criteria-for...
Criteria for Bibliographic Databases in a Well-Functioning Scholarly Communication and Research Assessment Ecosystem
Bibliographic databases should support innovation and experimentation. Here, we offer four criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases. We urge the global research community to use databa...
upstream.force11.org
January 15, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Current bibliographic databases like Web of Science and Scopus shape what “counts” in research & influence how researchers are assessed. Do they support innovation?
Take a look at our proposal for four criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases
upstream.force11.org/criteria-for...
Take a look at our proposal for four criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases
upstream.force11.org/criteria-for...
Reposted by annahatch.bsky.social
NINDS just launched a $50K prize competition for early-career scientists championing research rigor beyond their normal duties. Do you organize workshops, journal clubs, or do work to try and shift culture? This could be you.
www.challenge.gov?challenge=ni...
www.challenge.gov?challenge=ni...
Challenge.Gov
Challenge.Gov is the official GSA government website supporting prize challenges and prize competitions that are sponsored by the US federal government. Here federal agencies provide prize awards to ...
www.challenge.gov
January 9, 2025 at 12:07 AM
NINDS just launched a $50K prize competition for early-career scientists championing research rigor beyond their normal duties. Do you organize workshops, journal clubs, or do work to try and shift culture? This could be you.
www.challenge.gov?challenge=ni...
www.challenge.gov?challenge=ni...
Reposted by annahatch.bsky.social
There's a very strange expectation that any one proposed science reform must:
1) Fully solve a problem
2) Solve MANY vaguelly related problems
3) Have zero negative impact on anything
No single reform like that exists, so the status quo bias reigns and everyone gets pretty weird about it.
1) Fully solve a problem
2) Solve MANY vaguelly related problems
3) Have zero negative impact on anything
No single reform like that exists, so the status quo bias reigns and everyone gets pretty weird about it.
December 18, 2024 at 3:01 PM
There's a very strange expectation that any one proposed science reform must:
1) Fully solve a problem
2) Solve MANY vaguelly related problems
3) Have zero negative impact on anything
No single reform like that exists, so the status quo bias reigns and everyone gets pretty weird about it.
1) Fully solve a problem
2) Solve MANY vaguelly related problems
3) Have zero negative impact on anything
No single reform like that exists, so the status quo bias reigns and everyone gets pretty weird about it.