Andrew Eager
@andreweager.bsky.social
Disavowed and disdained by the Left and the Right - the seal of approval that assures you you're doing something right. A 'regime apologist' to some.
It wasn't Pratchett that said that, it was Barbra Cartland.
November 7, 2025 at 9:28 AM
It wasn't Pratchett that said that, it was Barbra Cartland.
I want to see it with my own eyes. I'm romantic like that.
October 10, 2025 at 9:56 AM
I want to see it with my own eyes. I'm romantic like that.
No, but it *can* be seen by the great unwashed like me.
October 10, 2025 at 9:52 AM
No, but it *can* be seen by the great unwashed like me.
So the Sistine Chapel ends up in the hands of a private collector never to be seen again? Not sure I see the wisdom in that.
October 10, 2025 at 9:04 AM
So the Sistine Chapel ends up in the hands of a private collector never to be seen again? Not sure I see the wisdom in that.
But never in their favour, curiously....
October 10, 2025 at 8:20 AM
But never in their favour, curiously....
That's wealth, not riches.
There's a difference.
What would you have him do? Break it down and sell it on eBay in pieces?
There's a difference.
What would you have him do? Break it down and sell it on eBay in pieces?
October 9, 2025 at 7:19 PM
That's wealth, not riches.
There's a difference.
What would you have him do? Break it down and sell it on eBay in pieces?
There's a difference.
What would you have him do? Break it down and sell it on eBay in pieces?
It's not that she took the job.
It's that she took the job and was facilitating evictions while masquerading as a socialist who championed the working class and poor.
It's about integrity and hypocrisy.
It's that she took the job and was facilitating evictions while masquerading as a socialist who championed the working class and poor.
It's about integrity and hypocrisy.
October 9, 2025 at 6:33 PM
It's not that she took the job.
It's that she took the job and was facilitating evictions while masquerading as a socialist who championed the working class and poor.
It's about integrity and hypocrisy.
It's that she took the job and was facilitating evictions while masquerading as a socialist who championed the working class and poor.
It's about integrity and hypocrisy.
She's on Dáil record as saying we don't need and shouldn't have the Defence Forces....you might be waiting a while.
October 9, 2025 at 12:29 PM
She's on Dáil record as saying we don't need and shouldn't have the Defence Forces....you might be waiting a while.
A start, and no more than that.
October 7, 2025 at 8:16 PM
A start, and no more than that.
Sooner knowing Red Bull ...
October 2, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Sooner knowing Red Bull ...
Was she not busy telling us we were all too stupid to allow vote on stuff yesterday morning?
October 2, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Was she not busy telling us we were all too stupid to allow vote on stuff yesterday morning?
A bit old-fashioned that, don't you think?
October 1, 2025 at 4:19 PM
A bit old-fashioned that, don't you think?
Maybe a bit of both might be in order....
October 1, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Maybe a bit of both might be in order....
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Paul Murphy....
September 30, 2025 at 8:00 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Paul Murphy....
So your reality is to be racist and then presume to take the moral high ground with that racism.
Okay so. Bonkers, utterly bonkers, but yeah, like I said, have at it, my clearly damaged friend.
Okay so. Bonkers, utterly bonkers, but yeah, like I said, have at it, my clearly damaged friend.
September 30, 2025 at 5:35 PM
So your reality is to be racist and then presume to take the moral high ground with that racism.
Okay so. Bonkers, utterly bonkers, but yeah, like I said, have at it, my clearly damaged friend.
Okay so. Bonkers, utterly bonkers, but yeah, like I said, have at it, my clearly damaged friend.
All white men everywhere have hurt you, rich and poor alike?
If you can't see the willfully fallacious nature of that statement, it is certainly not I that has the tangential relationship with reality...
If you can't see the willfully fallacious nature of that statement, it is certainly not I that has the tangential relationship with reality...
September 30, 2025 at 5:33 PM
All white men everywhere have hurt you, rich and poor alike?
If you can't see the willfully fallacious nature of that statement, it is certainly not I that has the tangential relationship with reality...
If you can't see the willfully fallacious nature of that statement, it is certainly not I that has the tangential relationship with reality...
Honestly what part of the "content of a person's character", and not the colour of their skin, do you think your initial statement aligns with?
September 30, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Honestly what part of the "content of a person's character", and not the colour of their skin, do you think your initial statement aligns with?
That you present "reality" as being white men doing violence is what is really telling.
It just goes to show, some bigotry is still acceptable, chic even, in this day and age. Mad when you think about it.
It just goes to show, some bigotry is still acceptable, chic even, in this day and age. Mad when you think about it.
September 30, 2025 at 4:54 PM
That you present "reality" as being white men doing violence is what is really telling.
It just goes to show, some bigotry is still acceptable, chic even, in this day and age. Mad when you think about it.
It just goes to show, some bigotry is still acceptable, chic even, in this day and age. Mad when you think about it.
We can go further by noting that you dehumanized people by referring to them as animals.
But sure, yeah, if you think your statement would wash as being okay if white was replaced with any of the other descriptions I gave you have at it. You've been told. That's all I can do.
But sure, yeah, if you think your statement would wash as being okay if white was replaced with any of the other descriptions I gave you have at it. You've been told. That's all I can do.
September 30, 2025 at 4:51 PM
We can go further by noting that you dehumanized people by referring to them as animals.
But sure, yeah, if you think your statement would wash as being okay if white was replaced with any of the other descriptions I gave you have at it. You've been told. That's all I can do.
But sure, yeah, if you think your statement would wash as being okay if white was replaced with any of the other descriptions I gave you have at it. You've been told. That's all I can do.
Wut?
Racism is about dismissing an entire class of people based on inherited characteristics that they have no control over.
I didn't for a moment pretend that while men don't do bad things.
I objected to your assertion that they all do, which is what you imply because that's racist.
Racism is about dismissing an entire class of people based on inherited characteristics that they have no control over.
I didn't for a moment pretend that while men don't do bad things.
I objected to your assertion that they all do, which is what you imply because that's racist.
September 30, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Wut?
Racism is about dismissing an entire class of people based on inherited characteristics that they have no control over.
I didn't for a moment pretend that while men don't do bad things.
I objected to your assertion that they all do, which is what you imply because that's racist.
Racism is about dismissing an entire class of people based on inherited characteristics that they have no control over.
I didn't for a moment pretend that while men don't do bad things.
I objected to your assertion that they all do, which is what you imply because that's racist.
Insert 'muslim, 'black' 'asian' or 'jewish' where white is, in that tweet and tell me what it reads like.
September 30, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Insert 'muslim, 'black' 'asian' or 'jewish' where white is, in that tweet and tell me what it reads like.
Your racism is showing.
You might want to watch that.
You might want to watch that.
September 30, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Your racism is showing.
You might want to watch that.
You might want to watch that.
Utter nonsense from you, Paul, yet again.
Colour me shocked.
Tell me, was Ukraine pro-war in 2014 when Viktor Yuschenko was poisoned by Putin in 2004?
Was it pro-war in 2014 when Russia invaded Crimea?
Was it pro-war when Russia invaded again in 2022?
Risible stuff from you.
Colour me shocked.
Tell me, was Ukraine pro-war in 2014 when Viktor Yuschenko was poisoned by Putin in 2004?
Was it pro-war in 2014 when Russia invaded Crimea?
Was it pro-war when Russia invaded again in 2022?
Risible stuff from you.
September 30, 2025 at 9:19 AM
Utter nonsense from you, Paul, yet again.
Colour me shocked.
Tell me, was Ukraine pro-war in 2014 when Viktor Yuschenko was poisoned by Putin in 2004?
Was it pro-war in 2014 when Russia invaded Crimea?
Was it pro-war when Russia invaded again in 2022?
Risible stuff from you.
Colour me shocked.
Tell me, was Ukraine pro-war in 2014 when Viktor Yuschenko was poisoned by Putin in 2004?
Was it pro-war in 2014 when Russia invaded Crimea?
Was it pro-war when Russia invaded again in 2022?
Risible stuff from you.
It's not a pleasant thing to see certainly, and to a degree is actually emboldening Putin, but one can see the wisdom in being in a position to make it all very brief and very clinical.
September 29, 2025 at 4:12 PM
It's not a pleasant thing to see certainly, and to a degree is actually emboldening Putin, but one can see the wisdom in being in a position to make it all very brief and very clinical.