@anarcho-idk.bsky.social
an"com" but like chill about it
feminism, border abolition, total liberation, opposition to all domination and control, occasional interpretive charity and epistemic humility
I think a lot of different (and sometimes opposed) ideas have merit
feminism, border abolition, total liberation, opposition to all domination and control, occasional interpretive charity and epistemic humility
I think a lot of different (and sometimes opposed) ideas have merit
They did do that, actually! The same basic pattern holds, but the size of the gap between fair/poor vs good/very good/excellent health varies somewhat
The whole report is here: www.kff.org/private-insu...
The whole report is here: www.kff.org/private-insu...
December 11, 2024 at 9:48 AM
They did do that, actually! The same basic pattern holds, but the size of the gap between fair/poor vs good/very good/excellent health varies somewhat
The whole report is here: www.kff.org/private-insu...
The whole report is here: www.kff.org/private-insu...
That's an important point! But it doesn't refute what Stancil is saying here. The "twice as likely" is 31% vs 16%.
Even among people in fair/poor health, just over two-thirds rate their insurance company's overall performance positively, compared to a bit over four-fifths of people in good health.
Even among people in fair/poor health, just over two-thirds rate their insurance company's overall performance positively, compared to a bit over four-fifths of people in good health.
December 7, 2024 at 4:02 PM
That's an important point! But it doesn't refute what Stancil is saying here. The "twice as likely" is 31% vs 16%.
Even among people in fair/poor health, just over two-thirds rate their insurance company's overall performance positively, compared to a bit over four-fifths of people in good health.
Even among people in fair/poor health, just over two-thirds rate their insurance company's overall performance positively, compared to a bit over four-fifths of people in good health.
NPR's description doesn't actually downplay how unhappy people are with their insurance. Almost the opposite, if anything. The twice as likely means 31% vs 16%.
That means 69% of people with poor/fair health rate their insurance positively, compared to 84% of people in good health.
That means 69% of people with poor/fair health rate their insurance positively, compared to 84% of people in good health.
December 7, 2024 at 6:41 AM
NPR's description doesn't actually downplay how unhappy people are with their insurance. Almost the opposite, if anything. The twice as likely means 31% vs 16%.
That means 69% of people with poor/fair health rate their insurance positively, compared to 84% of people in good health.
That means 69% of people with poor/fair health rate their insurance positively, compared to 84% of people in good health.