@amyralls.bsky.social
Reposted
My article is aimed at the general public, so it explains these three statistical issues in accessible language while showing why they matter for interpreting the study’s conclusions.
The link to my full article follows:
theconversation.com/why-a-study-...
The link to my full article follows:
theconversation.com/why-a-study-...
Why a study claiming vaccines cause chronic illness is severely flawed – a biostatistician explains the biases and unsupported conclusions
The main comparisons in the unpublished report are skewed, and it is being presented as stronger evidence than its design really allows.
theconversation.com
September 26, 2025 at 7:19 PM
My article is aimed at the general public, so it explains these three statistical issues in accessible language while showing why they matter for interpreting the study’s conclusions.
The link to my full article follows:
theconversation.com/why-a-study-...
The link to my full article follows:
theconversation.com/why-a-study-...
Bear is showing off the flowers he didn’t run through.
June 2, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Bear is showing off the flowers he didn’t run through.