Without a hint of empathy, Donald Trump said his former close friend Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' a teenage Mar-a-Lago spa worker named Virginia Giuffre.

What’s that? You want a reason to be even more worried about the duration of the inevitable post-2026 MLB lockout when the current Collective Bargaining Agreement expires? Well, in that case, I have great news for you! The players and the commissioner are kinda already at each other’s throats: Philadelphia Phillies star Bryce Harper stood nose to nose with MLB commissioner Rob Manfred during a meeting last week and told him to “get the f— out of our clubhouse” if he wanted to talk about a salary cap, sources told ESPN. News free and unlocked: https://t.co/DukJC3i8T5— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) July 28, 2025 From the ESPN report: ‘Quiet for the majority of the meeting, Harper, sitting in a chair and holding a bat, eventually grew frustrated and said if MLB were to propose a cap and hold firm to it, players “are not scared to lose 162 games,” sources from the meeting told ESPN. Harper stood up, walked toward the middle of the room, faced Manfred and said: “If you want to speak about that, you can get the f— out of our clubhouse.” Manfred, sources said, responded that he was “not going to get the f— out of here,” saying it was important to talk about threats to MLB’s business and ways to grow the game. Before the situation further intensified, veteran outfielder Nick Castellanos tried to defuse the tension, saying: “I have more questions.” The meeting continued, and Harper and Manfred eventually shook hands, sources said, though Harper declined to answer phone calls from Manfred the next day.’ Yikes. Not that you’d expect talk of a salary cap to go well in front of the players, but this level of acrimony, a year and a half ahead of the real fight, is concerning. It was all concerning already. But this sums up just how ugly things could get. Without speaking to the particular desirability of a salary cap, I do think it’s inarguable that the league and its players need to be thoughtful about the evolving entertainment landscape. Status quo is pretty obviously not going to work, as more and more regional sports networks go by the wayside (and with them those easy, outsized cable dollars). That was always going to make the next CBA fight an ugly one, between the players and the owners, between the small-market owners and the large-market owners, and maybe even between the pre-arb/lower-salary players and the superstars who’ve already hit it big. When the shape of the pie changes as fundamentally as it probably will in the years ahead, it makes the fights about how to cut it up all the more difficult. Players do not want a salary cap, and the rationale there is plain: no artificial limits on how much a player can earn while he is in his earning years. It’s not a difficult argument for me to see the merits. Owners, meanwhile, want to control spending around the league (partially for parity, but mostly for for franchise valuations). I’ll admit to being less sympathetic on this side of the ledger, but I don’t think it’s wrong to argue that the current system is not the best fit for the future of the sport. I can at least understand it, whether I agree or not. For my part, I just want the fans to be taken care of, which means (1) teams generally all competing to put the best teams they can on the field, (2) affordable access to games, (3) wide and easy distribution of games on TV/streaming/etc., and (4) the long-term health of the sport is always top of mind. That may mean a cap and floor system – in which a guaranteed chunk of the revenue is going to the players, as it is in the other salary-capped sports – or it may mean continuing to modify the current setup. It is necessarily a very difficult and complicated dance, with everyone understandably trying to get the most they can. I just hope there’s at least as much thought given to growing the pie as how to share it. I will say that, whatever my opinion on the owners’ push for a cap, which is clearly going to be the fight this time around, I do appreciate that the commissioner is teeing it up now. Maybe if the sides get ugly right now about the cap, they can get to a slightly better place by December 2026 when the lockout begins. And then maybe, in turn, the sides can come together on a deal that makes sense for everyone before losing too many games (and a Wrigley Field All-Star Game) in 2027.