The Court struck down aggregate contribution limits, arguing that there's not enough evidence to support the link between these limits and corruption.
The Court struck down aggregate contribution limits, arguing that there's not enough evidence to support the link between these limits and corruption.
This case overturned the ban on independent political spending by corporations and unions, arguing that such spending is protected by the First Amendment and does not pose a significant risk of corruption.
This case overturned the ban on independent political spending by corporations and unions, arguing that such spending is protected by the First Amendment and does not pose a significant risk of corruption.
This case expanded the right to spend money to promote political views to include corporations.
This case expanded the right to spend money to promote political views to include corporations.
1. Buckley v. Valeo (1976):
This case established that spending money on political campaigns is a form of protected speech and that restrictions on spending are subject to strict scrutiny.
1. Buckley v. Valeo (1976):
This case established that spending money on political campaigns is a form of protected speech and that restrictions on spending are subject to strict scrutiny.