Sad to say, this one doesn't work either.
archive.is/202512032107...
archive.is/202512032107...
archive.is
December 3, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Sad to say, this one doesn't work either.
archive.is/202512032107...
archive.is/202512032107...
Share link not working for me. Try
archive.is/202512030840...
archive.is/202512030840...
archive.is
December 3, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Share link not working for me. Try
archive.is/202512030840...
archive.is/202512030840...
But one wouldn't want to be a burden on the taxpayers or hard working families, would one?
Or slow down the housing market? Very disappointing from Rawnsley.
Or slow down the housing market? Very disappointing from Rawnsley.
November 23, 2025 at 5:36 PM
But one wouldn't want to be a burden on the taxpayers or hard working families, would one?
Or slow down the housing market? Very disappointing from Rawnsley.
Or slow down the housing market? Very disappointing from Rawnsley.
Why, oh why, oh why is any government so desperate to push through a private member's bill with debate in committee tightly controlled by the bill's sponsor, with contrary voices ignored, and any semblance of oversight removed and no consideration of coercion? Where's the impact assessment?
November 23, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Why, oh why, oh why is any government so desperate to push through a private member's bill with debate in committee tightly controlled by the bill's sponsor, with contrary voices ignored, and any semblance of oversight removed and no consideration of coercion? Where's the impact assessment?
archive.is
November 19, 2025 at 10:59 PM
However, if you want to go down the rabbit hole, you might find a thread on Mumsnet of interest.
www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_...
www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_...
Page 24 | Sara Morrison vs Belfast Film Festival - Thread 2 | Mumsnet
Continuation of previous thread - don’t have all the details to hand to add here, so if someone can pop them on, pls do! Want to get this up quickly!
www.mumsnet.com
November 16, 2025 at 9:35 PM
However, if you want to go down the rabbit hole, you might find a thread on Mumsnet of interest.
www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_...
www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_...
The newsletter has more detail, but I can't post the whole thing here.
November 15, 2025 at 2:23 PM
The newsletter has more detail, but I can't post the whole thing here.
The Twitter threads are on the blog. And for a one off donation, you can get an email newsletter of each day of the tribunal.
November 15, 2025 at 1:44 PM
The Twitter threads are on the blog. And for a one off donation, you can get an email newsletter of each day of the tribunal.
The only thing I would add is that it is unwise to repeat a derogatory label applied by someone else unless one can be confident in that someone's judgement.
If you wish to know what the trans community are objecting to, you can find it here
www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k...
If you wish to know what the trans community are objecting to, you can find it here
www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k...
J.K. Rowling Writes about Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues - J.K. Rowling
Warning: The below content is not appropriate for children. Please check with an adult before you read this page. To go back to the children’s page, please click here. This isn’t an easy piece to writ...
www.jkrowling.com
November 13, 2025 at 12:36 AM
The only thing I would add is that it is unwise to repeat a derogatory label applied by someone else unless one can be confident in that someone's judgement.
If you wish to know what the trans community are objecting to, you can find it here
www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k...
If you wish to know what the trans community are objecting to, you can find it here
www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k...
If he's your friend, you owe it to him to explain that when he calls JKR a bigot he's spreading a lie, and that people will try to correct him; and that that's not an attack.
November 12, 2025 at 5:58 PM
If he's your friend, you owe it to him to explain that when he calls JKR a bigot he's spreading a lie, and that people will try to correct him; and that that's not an attack.
And that was the only sentence I could see in that letter which addressed the question in any way.
Some of it met the standards we set. Not most of it or all of it, but quite a bit. I think they're beyond help.
Some of it met the standards we set. Not most of it or all of it, but quite a bit. I think they're beyond help.
November 10, 2025 at 2:37 PM
And that was the only sentence I could see in that letter which addressed the question in any way.
Some of it met the standards we set. Not most of it or all of it, but quite a bit. I think they're beyond help.
Some of it met the standards we set. Not most of it or all of it, but quite a bit. I think they're beyond help.
Not to be confused with Emma Barnett.
November 10, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Not to be confused with Emma Barnett.
I think you mean Hannah Barnes.
November 10, 2025 at 1:08 PM
I think you mean Hannah Barnes.
That wouldn't be political at all.
November 10, 2025 at 11:15 AM
That wouldn't be political at all.
Well, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy will have control over the appointment of the DG, so what could possibly go wrong?
I think it's a mistake to get nostalgic for what the BBC once was. It's gone, and it's not coming back.
I think it's a mistake to get nostalgic for what the BBC once was. It's gone, and it's not coming back.
November 10, 2025 at 11:05 AM
Well, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy will have control over the appointment of the DG, so what could possibly go wrong?
I think it's a mistake to get nostalgic for what the BBC once was. It's gone, and it's not coming back.
I think it's a mistake to get nostalgic for what the BBC once was. It's gone, and it's not coming back.
How it works
archive.is/202511101019...
archive.is/202511101019...
archive.is
November 10, 2025 at 10:59 AM
How it works
archive.is/202511101019...
archive.is/202511101019...
It has been raised externally, but looking at the coverage on BBC news yesterday, it was barely mentioned. There is no sign of the BBC management appreciating the degree of control and distortion exercised by their TQ+ desk.
November 10, 2025 at 10:25 AM
It has been raised externally, but looking at the coverage on BBC news yesterday, it was barely mentioned. There is no sign of the BBC management appreciating the degree of control and distortion exercised by their TQ+ desk.
Your own profile picture belies your slander.
November 9, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Your own profile picture belies your slander.
Here's the Telegraph report of the leaked BBC memo.
archive.is/202511062000...
archive.is/202511062000...
archive.is
November 6, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Here's the Telegraph report of the leaked BBC memo.
archive.is/202511062000...
archive.is/202511062000...
It's a bold move by the BBC, issuing this in the midst of the revelations in the Telegraph. They appear to have no clue whatsoever.
November 6, 2025 at 5:11 PM
It's a bold move by the BBC, issuing this in the midst of the revelations in the Telegraph. They appear to have no clue whatsoever.