AkivaMCohen
@akivamcohen.bsky.social
Orthodox Jewish father of 5; Litigation Disaster Tour Guide; Jets Fan. Fighting the widening gyre.
Put it in the Louvre (but only after changing the security password, which is Louvre. We cannot lose this)
November 12, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Put it in the Louvre (but only after changing the security password, which is Louvre. We cannot lose this)
Other way around. Epstein to Maxwell, Maxwell agreed
November 12, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Other way around. Epstein to Maxwell, Maxwell agreed
For example, the report is deeply critical of Kenneth Marcus for ordering an OCR investigation of Cal-Irvine in 2004 in response to a ZOA complaint.
Here's what the complaint described.
The report is apparently waving off vandalism of holocaust memorials and ovens references as "antizionism"
Here's what the complaint described.
The report is apparently waving off vandalism of holocaust memorials and ovens references as "antizionism"
November 12, 2025 at 2:43 PM
For example, the report is deeply critical of Kenneth Marcus for ordering an OCR investigation of Cal-Irvine in 2004 in response to a ZOA complaint.
Here's what the complaint described.
The report is apparently waving off vandalism of holocaust memorials and ovens references as "antizionism"
Here's what the complaint described.
The report is apparently waving off vandalism of holocaust memorials and ovens references as "antizionism"
This headline is journalistic malpractice. This isn't Epstein "alleging" that Trump knew. This is Epstein and Maxwell discussing - in 2011, long before Trump had political salience - how the FACT that Trump knew might play out
Both of them took as a given that this was a fact in a private email
Both of them took as a given that this was a fact in a private email
November 12, 2025 at 2:08 PM
This headline is journalistic malpractice. This isn't Epstein "alleging" that Trump knew. This is Epstein and Maxwell discussing - in 2011, long before Trump had political salience - how the FACT that Trump knew might play out
Both of them took as a given that this was a fact in a private email
Both of them took as a given that this was a fact in a private email
Two guesses what "evil empire" this woman is referring to. It's like someone programmed an AI to parody a socialist
November 12, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Two guesses what "evil empire" this woman is referring to. It's like someone programmed an AI to parody a socialist
Lawrence is already getting sacked at this point but the receiver created about 2 yards of separation out of that break & if Lawrence had thrown with anticipation that's a minimum of first down yardage. Put the ball in the right spot and - with the safety committed - a huge play was possible
November 10, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Lawrence is already getting sacked at this point but the receiver created about 2 yards of separation out of that break & if Lawrence had thrown with anticipation that's a minimum of first down yardage. Put the ball in the right spot and - with the safety committed - a huge play was possible
Like - right here, in this moment, the QB needs to know that's a completion if he wants it, and I don't know what else he would be reading on that play other than that LB.
The S would be an issue if the receiver were running anything other than a hook but since he isn't ...
The S would be an issue if the receiver were running anything other than a hook but since he isn't ...
November 10, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Like - right here, in this moment, the QB needs to know that's a completion if he wants it, and I don't know what else he would be reading on that play other than that LB.
The S would be an issue if the receiver were running anything other than a hook but since he isn't ...
The S would be an issue if the receiver were running anything other than a hook but since he isn't ...
Presented without comment
November 10, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Presented without comment
This is just amazing
Andrews: Here's an example of political correctness gone too far. In one landmark 1990s case, a woman was able to get a court to say men couldn't have pinups
Sargeant: Are you out of your mind? It was way more than pinups
Andrews: Right, we all agree she should have won
Andrews: Here's an example of political correctness gone too far. In one landmark 1990s case, a woman was able to get a court to say men couldn't have pinups
Sargeant: Are you out of your mind? It was way more than pinups
Andrews: Right, we all agree she should have won
November 9, 2025 at 3:01 PM
This is just amazing
Andrews: Here's an example of political correctness gone too far. In one landmark 1990s case, a woman was able to get a court to say men couldn't have pinups
Sargeant: Are you out of your mind? It was way more than pinups
Andrews: Right, we all agree she should have won
Andrews: Here's an example of political correctness gone too far. In one landmark 1990s case, a woman was able to get a court to say men couldn't have pinups
Sargeant: Are you out of your mind? It was way more than pinups
Andrews: Right, we all agree she should have won
Somehow this guy has 12k followers
November 4, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Somehow this guy has 12k followers
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
November 4, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
Yes, Tony Pizza. That is correct
October 30, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Yes, Tony Pizza. That is correct
I don't know how to say this any clearer: the fact that someone says nice, progressive things and appears to be left wing *does not mean* they are not also the worst kind of antisemite
October 26, 2025 at 1:34 AM
I don't know how to say this any clearer: the fact that someone says nice, progressive things and appears to be left wing *does not mean* they are not also the worst kind of antisemite
The masks just keep coming off
October 24, 2025 at 4:28 PM
The masks just keep coming off
Also, he posted that the tattoo "closely resembled a Nazi symbol" - no. It *was* a Nazi symbol.
Also also, he's acting like he just learned that. Again, no: he was telling people in 2012 that he knew it.
He kept that inked on his chest until just now.
Also also, he's acting like he just learned that. Again, no: he was telling people in 2012 that he knew it.
He kept that inked on his chest until just now.
October 23, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Also, he posted that the tattoo "closely resembled a Nazi symbol" - no. It *was* a Nazi symbol.
Also also, he's acting like he just learned that. Again, no: he was telling people in 2012 that he knew it.
He kept that inked on his chest until just now.
Also also, he's acting like he just learned that. Again, no: he was telling people in 2012 that he knew it.
He kept that inked on his chest until just now.
Again: He knew.
Source: Graham Platner, in conversations in 2012.
Source: Graham Platner, in conversations in 2012.
October 23, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Again: He knew.
Source: Graham Platner, in conversations in 2012.
Source: Graham Platner, in conversations in 2012.
The fact that he told people in 2012 that he knew it was a Nazi symbol?
October 23, 2025 at 7:13 PM
The fact that he told people in 2012 that he knew it was a Nazi symbol?
Also, Platner DID know
October 23, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Also, Platner DID know
A little TOO on the nose, don't you think?
October 23, 2025 at 3:43 PM
A little TOO on the nose, don't you think?
This is a DESPERATELY needed bluntness from the lower courts
September 30, 2025 at 5:41 PM
This is a DESPERATELY needed bluntness from the lower courts
Like ... do you not see how, say, Charlie Kirk would have used this statute were he given the power to control its application?
September 17, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Like ... do you not see how, say, Charlie Kirk would have used this statute were he given the power to control its application?
Given Justice Jackson's recent dissent, I think this particular shot lands even harder than the one Rick quoted
September 3, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Given Justice Jackson's recent dissent, I think this particular shot lands even harder than the one Rick quoted
Optimus: There's no occupation unless one side has surrendered
The US Army, DOD, ICRC: Lol, no, that's wrong
The US Army, DOD, ICRC: Lol, no, that's wrong
September 3, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Optimus: There's no occupation unless one side has surrendered
The US Army, DOD, ICRC: Lol, no, that's wrong
The US Army, DOD, ICRC: Lol, no, that's wrong
