Aidan Tee
@aidan-sj-tee.bsky.social
Current Lab Research Technician in the Psychology Dept at Warwick Uni | Former RA in the SAMPLING LAB at Warwick Uni | MSc Finance and Economics Graduate | Avid enjoyer of football, motorsports, drumming, and quizzing
Pinned
Aidan Tee
@aidan-sj-tee.bsky.social
· Feb 6
OSF
osf.io
In our new preprint, my co-authors and I explore how people’s probability judgments sometimes don’t add up the way they should, and how these violations can help us compare different models of how people make these judgments!
osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io/preprints/ps...
Reposted by Aidan Tee
"Noise in Cognition: Bug or Feature?" is now available in Perspectives on Psychological Science
doi.org/10.1177/1745... (1/4)
doi.org/10.1177/1745... (1/4)
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
doi.org
March 4, 2025 at 10:33 PM
"Noise in Cognition: Bug or Feature?" is now available in Perspectives on Psychological Science
doi.org/10.1177/1745... (1/4)
doi.org/10.1177/1745... (1/4)
Reposted by Aidan Tee
🚨 A new preprint is out!
How does utility influence mental simulations of risky events? 🤔🎲
We tested this across 4 experiments & found that most people simulate probabilities accurately, but biases emerge in key conditions!
If you want to learn more, keep reading!
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
How does utility influence mental simulations of risky events? 🤔🎲
We tested this across 4 experiments & found that most people simulate probabilities accurately, but biases emerge in key conditions!
If you want to learn more, keep reading!
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
OSF
doi.org
February 20, 2025 at 6:42 PM
🚨 A new preprint is out!
How does utility influence mental simulations of risky events? 🤔🎲
We tested this across 4 experiments & found that most people simulate probabilities accurately, but biases emerge in key conditions!
If you want to learn more, keep reading!
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
How does utility influence mental simulations of risky events? 🤔🎲
We tested this across 4 experiments & found that most people simulate probabilities accurately, but biases emerge in key conditions!
If you want to learn more, keep reading!
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
Reposted by Aidan Tee
New Preprint Out! 🚀🚀
Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time?
Keep reading if
- You make cognitive models with randomness in them
- You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well
- You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior.
osf.io/awg9j
Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time?
Keep reading if
- You make cognitive models with randomness in them
- You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well
- You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior.
osf.io/awg9j
OSF
osf.io
February 20, 2025 at 11:14 AM
New Preprint Out! 🚀🚀
Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time?
Keep reading if
- You make cognitive models with randomness in them
- You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well
- You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior.
osf.io/awg9j
Can people generate a random sequence if given enough time?
Keep reading if
- You make cognitive models with randomness in them
- You like to explore the world, be creative, choose well
- You want protection from clever agents exploiting patterns in your behavior.
osf.io/awg9j
In our new preprint, my co-authors and I explore how people’s probability judgments sometimes don’t add up the way they should, and how these violations can help us compare different models of how people make these judgments!
osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
February 6, 2025 at 3:20 PM
In our new preprint, my co-authors and I explore how people’s probability judgments sometimes don’t add up the way they should, and how these violations can help us compare different models of how people make these judgments!
osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io/preprints/ps...