www.theguardian.com/travel/2025/...
www.theguardian.com/travel/2025/...
(Image modified for humour )
(Image modified for humour )
They could have started this 10 m further on and had no disruption to bus users, but they simply do not care. Make the people with impairments travel a round about route to get to a bus especially if it is raining.
They could have started this 10 m further on and had no disruption to bus users, but they simply do not care. Make the people with impairments travel a round about route to get to a bus especially if it is raining.
What does the TRO say for this ? What was the cost
What does the TRO say for this ? What was the cost
This design should be career ending for any accredited professional that designed and signed off on it.
Wonder what the TRO says for that cross pavement section of course will they claim it is no longer pavement. If not it should have a detectable min 60mm edge and warning tactiles
This design should be career ending for any accredited professional that designed and signed off on it.
Wonder what the TRO says for that cross pavement section of course will they claim it is no longer pavement. If not it should have a detectable min 60mm edge and warning tactiles
Why are professional engineers allowed to do this type of infrastructure change without proper equality impacts or fear for their jobs ? This insane re-re-design removes agency from vulnerable people , ignores the transport hierarchy and what was the cost to make it worse
Why are professional engineers allowed to do this type of infrastructure change without proper equality impacts or fear for their jobs ? This insane re-re-design removes agency from vulnerable people , ignores the transport hierarchy and what was the cost to make it worse