Adorno's "History and Freedom" lectures are *really* good. It's easy to just pick out a lecture or two from the volume as well.

But that assumes a lot about the personal political beliefs of the administrators of those ‘elite’ institutions.

Carbon budgets and future projections of greenhouse gas concentrations and therefore temperature rises and rates assume continued absorption of carbon through these environments. Changing to sources in their own right seriously impacts these projections and plans for the mitigation and adaptation.

God does this feel good, especially since it also snubs the nose of so-called allies in the form of liberal politicians that only ever betrayed the movement

To be honest I think a lot of his phenomenon (and I say this as a person who generally likes his interviews) boils down to the fact that the existence of an interviewer that actually does his job and pushes back against claims seems outlandish in the present media landscape

the editorial direction of the Atlantic is unhinged btw, astounding randomness