@AdamEisgrau
@adameisgrau.bsky.social
#FairUse fighter for @ChamberofProgress’ Generate & Create campaign. JD, Hill staffer, long-time tech wonk. Amateur photographer, jazz lover, art junkie, avid house plant killer.
The case is Justice v. Suno, Inc., 1:25-cv-11739, (D. Mass.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7054...
Plaintiff's Opposition is online at:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.u...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7054...
Plaintiff's Opposition is online at:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.u...
November 12, 2025 at 5:01 PM
The case is Justice v. Suno, Inc., 1:25-cv-11739, (D. Mass.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7054...
Plaintiff's Opposition is online at:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.u...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7054...
Plaintiff's Opposition is online at:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.u...
Plaintiffs' filing argues variously that they've cleared the applicable low bar for stating an infringement case and, similarly, made their case for proceeding with their DMCA violation claims:
November 12, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Plaintiffs' filing argues variously that they've cleared the applicable low bar for stating an infringement case and, similarly, made their case for proceeding with their DMCA violation claims:
@OpenA.comI's 11/12 Letter seeking Judge Wang's reconsideration and ask to vacate her 11/7 Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
November 12, 2025 at 3:55 PM
@OpenA.comI's 11/12 Letter seeking Judge Wang's reconsideration and ask to vacate her 11/7 Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
The case is In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143, (S.D.N.Y.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
Judge Wang's 11/7 Order to produce millions of user output logs is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
Judge Wang's 11/7 Order to produce millions of user output logs is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
November 12, 2025 at 3:55 PM
The case is In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143, (S.D.N.Y.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
Judge Wang's 11/7 Order to produce millions of user output logs is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
Judge Wang's 11/7 Order to produce millions of user output logs is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
@OpenAI.com notes that, in fact, reliance on the Concord case is misplaced and concludes that "Nothing in the cited Concord Order supports ... Plaintiffs' demand for wholesale production" of so many private user communications out of all proportion to any alleged relevance or need:
November 12, 2025 at 3:55 PM
@OpenAI.com notes that, in fact, reliance on the Concord case is misplaced and concludes that "Nothing in the cited Concord Order supports ... Plaintiffs' demand for wholesale production" of so many private user communications out of all proportion to any alleged relevance or need:
@OpenAI.com argues in its 11/12 letter to Judge Wang that such broad discovery is not the rule in similar cases and that, contrary to her conclusion, it's had no meaningful procedural opportunity to rebut plaintiff's reliance on precedent they and Judge Wang rely on:
November 12, 2025 at 3:55 PM
@OpenAI.com argues in its 11/12 letter to Judge Wang that such broad discovery is not the rule in similar cases and that, contrary to her conclusion, it's had no meaningful procedural opportunity to rebut plaintiff's reliance on precedent they and Judge Wang rely on:
News Plaintiffs seek to comb through the millions of records at issue to assess whether and how user prompts may (or may not) have resulted in infringing outputs from @OpenAI.com's models.
November 12, 2025 at 3:55 PM
News Plaintiffs seek to comb through the millions of records at issue to assess whether and how user prompts may (or may not) have resulted in infringing outputs from @OpenAI.com's models.
Notably, the Court also refused @OpenAI's request to refer multiple questions of law to the European Court of Justice.
It's full opinion is not immediately available but reportedly will be released for publication to media outlets soon. Well take a deeper dive when it surfaces...
It's full opinion is not immediately available but reportedly will be released for publication to media outlets soon. Well take a deeper dive when it surfaces...
November 11, 2025 at 1:42 PM
Notably, the Court also refused @OpenAI's request to refer multiple questions of law to the European Court of Justice.
It's full opinion is not immediately available but reportedly will be released for publication to media outlets soon. Well take a deeper dive when it surfaces...
It's full opinion is not immediately available but reportedly will be released for publication to media outlets soon. Well take a deeper dive when it surfaces...
The ruling wasn't a surprise given comments from the judges at a September hearing. Coming from the equivalent of a federal district court, it will now be subject to multiple levels of appeal by @OpenAI.com. (Chart by Willkie, Farr & Gallgher)
www.willkie.com/-/media/fil...
www.willkie.com/-/media/fil...
November 11, 2025 at 1:42 PM
The ruling wasn't a surprise given comments from the judges at a September hearing. Coming from the equivalent of a federal district court, it will now be subject to multiple levels of appeal by @OpenAI.com. (Chart by Willkie, Farr & Gallgher)
www.willkie.com/-/media/fil...
www.willkie.com/-/media/fil...
This same Court will also hear GEMA's suit against @Suno.com in late January. While it will be critical to see its rationales to assess the ruling's likely impact, it's clearly already at odds with the recent UK ruling for @StabilityAI.com which held that their AI didn't memorize.
November 11, 2025 at 1:42 PM
This same Court will also hear GEMA's suit against @Suno.com in late January. While it will be critical to see its rationales to assess the ruling's likely impact, it's clearly already at odds with the recent UK ruling for @StabilityAI.com which held that their AI didn't memorize.
The case is Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, 3:24-cv-05417, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
Judge Alsup's 11/7 Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
Judge Alsup's 11/7 Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
November 10, 2025 at 2:26 PM
The case is Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, 3:24-cv-05417, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
Judge Alsup's 11/7 Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
Judge Alsup's 11/7 Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6905...
Judge Alsup may (or may not) step down at the end of this year but, as this Order clearly indicates, he's still keenly interested in and engaged with the fine details of what may well be a legacy case in his storied career on the bench.
November 10, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Judge Alsup may (or may not) step down at the end of this year but, as this Order clearly indicates, he's still keenly interested in and engaged with the fine details of what may well be a legacy case in his storied career on the bench.
Judge Alsup also denied the parties' proposed choice of Special Master whose presented credentials, he ruled, were "too thin" and and hourly rate ($1,000) "too high":
November 10, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Judge Alsup also denied the parties' proposed choice of Special Master whose presented credentials, he ruled, were "too thin" and and hourly rate ($1,000) "too high":
The Judge went further to dictate the precise language he ordered be used instead:
November 10, 2025 at 2:26 PM
The Judge went further to dictate the precise language he ordered be used instead:
For more details on the Court's legal findings and holding, see my 11/4 post here:
x.com/AdamEisgrau...
x.com/AdamEisgrau...
November 8, 2025 at 3:04 PM
For more details on the Court's legal findings and holding, see my 11/4 post here:
x.com/AdamEisgrau...
x.com/AdamEisgrau...
The new case is docketed as Entrepreneur Media, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:25-cv-09579, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
@Entrpreneur's 11/6 Complaint is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
@Entrpreneur's 11/6 Complaint is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
November 7, 2025 at 3:36 PM
The new case is docketed as Entrepreneur Media, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:25-cv-09579, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
@Entrpreneur's 11/6 Complaint is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
@Entrpreneur's 11/6 Complaint is here:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
@Entrepreneur.com's DMCA claims are clearest in the cause of action portion of the Complaint, here in full:
November 7, 2025 at 3:36 PM
@Entrepreneur.com's DMCA claims are clearest in the cause of action portion of the Complaint, here in full: