Learning about computational models of human behavior—still wading in the shallow end of the pool.
russpoldrack.substack.com/p/essential-...
I arrived at the conclusion that (1) there's a lot of interesting stuff about interactions and (2) the figure I was looking for does not exist.
So, I made it myself! Here's a simple illustration of how to control for confounding in interactions:>
I arrived at the conclusion that (1) there's a lot of interesting stuff about interactions and (2) the figure I was looking for does not exist.
So, I made it myself! Here's a simple illustration of how to control for confounding in interactions:>
This asteroid vs 1 million men.
But it’s the volume of a gorilla and the volume of the asteroid that matter.
A 23m asteroid could fit something like 20,000 gorillas if it were spherical. So let’s say 10,000, since it’s not.
This asteroid vs 1 million men.
Regardless if you work w/ 🧠 or 🧬🧫, often we attack inverse problems in 🧪 w/ methods hiding tons of assumptions. I write about the case of #ComplexNetworks 👇
open.substack.com/pub/manlius/...
Regardless if you work w/ 🧠 or 🧬🧫, often we attack inverse problems in 🧪 w/ methods hiding tons of assumptions. I write about the case of #ComplexNetworks 👇
open.substack.com/pub/manlius/...
As it happens, one of her papers also had funny data from a *different* B-school superstar -- a "mad, fraudulent unicorn,” per @jamesheathers.bsky.social... (1/3)
www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc...
As it happens, one of her papers also had funny data from a *different* B-school superstar -- a "mad, fraudulent unicorn,” per @jamesheathers.bsky.social... (1/3)
www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc...
Accepted in Psych Methods.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
Accepted in Psych Methods.
osf.io/preprints/ps...