4114n.bsky.social
@4114n.bsky.social
An attempt to submit my story to Reddit failed — the human-bot didn’t understand what we were talking about (twice) but had no problem going on a power trip.
September 13, 2025 at 2:58 PM
29/33 And the response regarding LGBT is especially interesting—indeed, since not every gay person in Russia is in prison, there is no danger for gays there. Again, it would be nice to have a comment from ministers. How convenient to not comment this!
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
27/33 Regarding the lies about the age of service, Anna Höök also shamelessly writes—the court considered other circumstances. Which ones? Unknown. Interestingly, at that time the court considered age such an important factor that it was stated separately in the ruling.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
24/33 Anna Höök no even tries to shy and write: not every soldier commits war crimes, so there is nothing wrong with serving in this army. So it is Sweden’s official position. I would ask the Prime Minister for a comment, but as we now know, he is forbidden from commenting.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
18/33 In April 2025 I submitted a petition with questions about the case to the Minister of Migration and the Prime Minister. 200 signatures. In response, I received a message that ministerial interference is prohibited, and they cannot comment on officials’ decisions.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
17/33 The judges were tired. The first decision had some creativity, but on 2025-01-20 Judge Mats Dahlström issued a very dull ruling: “I see no risk.” Appeal court judges Annika Lowén and Karin Öst on 2025-03-28 issued a template ruling — they too saw no risks.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
16/33 Next decision 2024-10-22 - Amanda Nygren also pretends to be an idiot and sees nothing wrong with serving in the Russian army. Same with the situation with LGBT — the official believes there is no danger, so there is no danger. They are not obliged to explain reasoning.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
15/33 I appealed again, and on 2024-05-07 Judge Josephine Boswell wrote that all these issues with the army are insignificant (so now 7 judges ignored direct lies in documents). However, I was granted a review of the case due to the new danger for LGBT people.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
14/33 Andreas Svahn again pretends to be an idiot, explaining to me that since I wasn’t persecuted before, nothing threatens me now! Of course, I left Russia a year before the LGBT movement was recognized as extremist. But what about current situation?! Nothing.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
11/33 Well, I filed a new application with the Migration Agency, where I explained all these “mistakes” in detail. 2024-03-20 - Andreas Svahn also pretends to be an idiot, acting as if he doesn’t know what the army actually does, the one I refuse to serve in.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
9/33 You can only appeal to other judges. So, on 2024-01-22, Catharina Abrahamsson and Hanna Kristiansson from the appeal court issued a new ruling: uphold the decision (despite being notified of the errors made by previous judges).
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
4/33 We appealed to court, and on 2023-11-17 the court issued a decision stating that the mobilization had ended, and that only people under 27 are drafted into the army. Many people took part in this ruling: Annelie Roslund, Kjell Larsson, Cecilia Nilsson and Marjaana Takala.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM
3/33 So, the first decision by Clara Asgharzadeh Lööv from 2023-06-08
"Unwillingness to serve in the army is not a reason for asylum."
Clara Asgharzadeh Lööv pretends to be an idiot and acts as if she doesn’t know what kind of army it is and what this army is doing.
August 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM