Robert Black
banner
hurricanexyz.bsky.social
Robert Black
@hurricanexyz.bsky.social

Constitutional scholar, general law nerd, Izzet mage, bear lover, Mets fan.
Trans rights are constitutional rights!
Uphold Yang Wenli Thought
He/him
https://www.eveningconstitutional.net

History 54%
Political science 16%
Pinned
I have an announcement!!

Introducing a new project at The Evening Constitutional: Constitutional Perspectives!

This is a series of explanatory essays aiming to be of use for readers with any level of prior knowledge of constitutional law

eveningconstitutional.net/introducing-...
Introducing: Constitutional Perspectives!
Announcing a new project here at The Evening Constitutional! As I wrote shortly after last November's election, one of my ambitions for this site is to create a library of materials explaining Americ...
eveningconstitutional.net

We're gonna win 286 House seats anyway lol, try 386

Trump saying this and then the election happening anyway is a recipe for 400 Democrats in the House

You destroy Mars though

Oh it definitely won't change the votes lol

So one question is, if Trump and Johnson yell fraud and have their goons bar (or arrest) Democrats, how many congressional Republicans would be willing to just like, show up for work, under those conditions

Right, it is the House that judges its elections, and he is not the House

Though we're not really doing legal argument as law here, we're doing legal argument as backdrop for a coup with goons

I do think there's also a very real chance that Trump purports to issue some kind of CANCEL THE MIDTERMS decree

(Which of course he has no power, legal or practical, to do. But it would certainly plunge us into the Cool Zone!)

(Actually, y'know, don't, for environmental protection reasons...)

Yeah, that's probably right. I dunno if Johnson would try to come up with some way to claim it falls to him, personally, as Speaker, in a way that would get him around having to have like every (outgoing) House Republican onside?

Go do it in the middle of the Sahara, which is MUCH easier, then let's talk

No I think it's meant to be a species of Republican, a Republican who panics

Either way it's an abomination

It will not be happening at the polling places, though. That much is clear

Something of that nature, though I expect the drama to be more localized in Congress itself

So uhhh, "panican" is meant to be... panic + Republican??

Want! The claim is that they want that!

"The dismantling of the patriarchy" oh, yeah?

I'm in favor of packing!

Right lol, this is also my intuition

It sounds a lot like something that certain *advocacy* groups would have come up with

No no, for the preferences of the, uhhhh, the people without homes let's call them, themselves

Have people done surveys?

I remain kind of curious what exactly the basis for that first claim is

In figure skating, the map from "what word do we use to describe the number of revolutions" to "how many actual degrees" is literally ill-defined! Most triples are 1080, but a triple axel is 1260.

Unfortunately you would also have to nuke one or possibly two American cities for it to have the full effect

Even so, I think

Would never naturally occur to me that "homeless" didn't describe a (potentially) temporary state tbh

Mmm, people love it when their government says this, famously

Can we go back in time and do this in 2011

YES PLEASE

Man I'm pretty sure 2028 is going to be about the Trump regime

Now I should say, I agree that packing will not fix this, not right away at least

One problem, of course, is that it's actively bad when things that are not in truth legitimate are made to seem legitimate