Senior Fellow at Carnegie China. For speaking engagements, please write to chinfinpettis@yahoo.com
Michael Pettis is an American professor of finance at Guanghua School of Management at Peking University in Beijing and a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He was founder and co-owner of punk-rock nightclub D22 in Beijing, which closed in January 2012. .. more
real effective exchange rate fell 19%—its largest adjustment since 1990. Because China’s costs are falling much faster than those in the U.S. and Europe, a modest annual appreciation of 4-5% will not erode export competitiveness and could even reduce trade frictions."
The Chief Economist at Huatai Securities believes the RMB is beginning a strengthening cycle: "Fundamentally, the yuan is highly competitive, and its relative price advantage is growing daily. Between April 2022 and June of this year, the yuan’s...
www.caixinglobal.com/2025-12-26/c...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
With no chance of a revival in property investment, this suggests that Beijing will have little choice but to engineer another surge in manufacturing investment.
This of course has global implications, i.e. more downward price pressures on a wider variety of manufactured goods.
But it also recognizes that it is harder than ever to justify more infrastructure investment on economic grounds, in which case the only way to rein in the debt burden is to rein in infrastructure investment.
screening projects to ensure they generate sufficient returns."
This puts Beijing in a tough position. It must revive investment if it is to achieve GDP growth of 5% in 2026.
Bloomberg: "One measure of borrowing by China’s local governments for infrastructure is on pace to hit a six-year low. Behind the downturn is China’s campaign to rein in so-called hidden local debt, along with increasingly stringent rules for...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.yicaiglobal.com/news/china-e...
www.yicaiglobal.com/news/almost-...
Reposted by Michael Pettis
The obvious lesson here is that while import restrictions do indeed limit consumer choice in the short term, in an economy with enough domestic demand they can also create a very efficient domestic industry that ultimately provides much greater consumer choice.
Foreign drones could be imported only for narrow research or demonstration purposes and were not permitted for aerial photography, infrastructure inspection, mapping, or logistics, What is more, foreign drones were excluded from government procurement.
It certainly does, but perhaps only in the very short term. The irony of course is that in the early 2000s, when China was trying to build its own drone industry, there were similar restrictions on higher-quality foreign imports.
"In a statement provided to Caixin," the article continues, "Chinese drone maker DJI said it regretted the FCC’s decision, arguing that the move limits consumer choice and undermines principles of open and fair competition."
Caixin: "The FCC said that foreign-made drones and key components pose an “unacceptable risk” to U.S. national and public safety and should be added to the agency’s Covered List, a move that would bar new models from receiving regulatory approval."
www.caixinglobal.com/2025-12-24/u...
www.reuters.com/world/asia-p...