stealingsand
banner
stealingsand.bsky.social
stealingsand
@stealingsand.bsky.social
If the bass drops in the forest, and no one is there to hear it, is it still off the chain?

(∩`-´)⊃━ ☆゚.*・。゚ 林蔤雅 • 임미아

Pottery | science | cats | justice | NE DFW | mola mola at ❤️ | UX/Accessibility

Cover by @devinellekurtz.bsky.social
Pinned
7/ Pottery/clay/ceramics. It's incredibly humbling - even if you do everything right, it can still come out horribly wrong 🤣
Reposted by stealingsand
What other articles has this Jacob Bernstein guy written...

Won't someone think of the guy who was paid to run PR for a convicted sex offender?
November 14, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
"I will reread them so much they will know the death of the author was caused by me"

(i love rereading.)
need to kill the recurring thought of "no I can't replay/reread that, I have other stuff to check out"

no. I am a poor little peasant living just after the advent of the printing press. I have five books at most and I will reread them so much they will know the death of the author was caused by me
November 14, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
So about Blonde racists being allowed to take their racism into aiding death and abetting pedophiles and those that love them
what the actual fuck
November 14, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
I will no doubt read and enjoy all your very good Nuzzi jokes, but I also want to say earnestly, so many of us (myself included) are on the verge of being pushed out of this industry and it's genuinely so dispiriting to see the worst among us, ethics-wise, get such preferential treatment.
November 14, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
'Instead of “How are our attitudes being reflected in TV and film?” I think the better question is “How is pop culture attempting to shape and mold attitudes?”' -- @ninametz.bsky.social
The hollowness of Hollywood’s rich people stories
TV and film of the moment aren't going to galvanize anyone. But stories closer to home just might.
buttondown.com
November 14, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
Sorry but it's extra funny the NYT is running a glamour profile on RFKs mistress/reporter the day after people were going to the mattresses defending their ethics surrounding the Epstein cover up
November 14, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
Fatphobia goes hand in hand with transphobia and is rampant even in otherwise progressive spaces because it makes people feel a sense of control to police their own and other people's bodies. It is social poison and we will never eliminate transphobia without eliminating anti-fatness.
"my least woke opinion is---"

That's enough. We've had enough people indulging in the "thrill of a little conservatism", as a treat. Of considering reactionary thought to be a salacious and taboo in a world descending into reactionary mania.

Give me your MOST woke opinions. We're bringing it back.
November 14, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
Jasmine Crockett is a Congresswoman, so she'll get it even worse. And she's Black, so she'll get it even worse than *that*.

I obviously can't speak for her, but I know I personally wouldn't care so much about my appearance in court if it wasn't dissected so much.
November 14, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
So I'm just wondering if all the people complaining about her getting her hair and nails done to appear IN LITERAL CONGRESS would be complaining about her appearance if she showed up like Fetterman.

I'm guessing yes.
November 14, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
hate winter because my microplastics get all stiff and brittle
November 14, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
You'll ignore this, but every time you tweet angrily about crap like that Nuzzi piece you're confirming NYT editors' intuitions/incentivizing more of it. The entire intellectual/journo model here is, "Does this person get people angry? Yes? OK they're provocative/get talked about. Write about her."
November 14, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
Bluesky defends the honor of Charlie Kirk and Megyn Kelly because they all go to the same parties and the money comes from the same places.
They would not defend the honor of trans people or black people or palestinians because "eww"
November 14, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
this is an exaggerated version of something I've encountered a lot talking to other men about #MeToo stuff; they could imagine themselves as the accused man (and thus, in their heads, as the 'wrongly' accused man) but not as the victim of abuse.
November 14, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
one of the other things that class difference allows abusers to do is convince themselves that a) this would happen to the girls anyway, b) that they're actually doing them a favor, c) to be cheap as fuck about the whole thing and get off on that too.
November 14, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
one of the underlying factors in all the Epstein stuff is that his correspondents - even the ones who likely did not participate in abuse themselves - are completely incapable of imagining his victims as people. he is real to them, the girls aren't.
I sometimes feel like they don’t want to end poverty or reduce inequality because they believe they’re entitled to a class of people they can prey upon
November 14, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
And also rooted in the assumption that they could not simply be easily replaced by teach-by-contract adjuncts with no job security.

In enabling the two-tier academic caste system, tenure-line academics have destroyed their own bargaining power, a think predicted for decades now. And here we are.
November 14, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
amazing that bluesky's moderation makes metafilter's look bespoke and wise
November 14, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
😻😻😻CLEANSING THERMONUCLEAR FIRE IS CANCELED FOR THE LATE MORNING!

SO MANY CATS IN THE REPLIES!😻😻😻
The jokes about how the internet is "just for cat pictures" kinda bug me, because they trivialize this incredible technological achievement that has changed so many lives

Some of us are allergic to cats. Our parasocial relationships with your animals sustain us. We need your cat pictures. Send them
November 14, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
Chris Murphy: "I don't think anybody with ambition right now should be planning on running for president in 2028 because we might not have a free and fair election in 2028. We all have to be in the business of saving our democracy right now."
November 14, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
MAGA’s ongoing war on academic freedom, reflected in headlines from the last 24 hours.
November 14, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
i still refuse to back down from my belief that every single living person has the capacity for artistic genius. society-as-profit has just crushed those of us who don't happen to luck out
November 13, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
I am honestly tired of the Epstein file jokes. Those emails aren’t funny, they’re a horror show that put on display exactly what kind of monsters have been running the show for decades, on both sides of the fence.
November 14, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
1. We are ruled by a group of pedophiles that I refuse to call a cabal because cabals work in the fucking shadows, this was all out in the open. The entire ruling class knew what was happening they talked about it openly and none of them cared.

Moreover, ICE must be destroyed
November 13, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
On measles and vaccines, Canada can’t keep ignoring the elephant in the room: Political identity is now the driving force behind vaccine hesitancy, by @caulfieldtim.bsky.social www.thestar.com/opinion/cont... via @thestar.com
On measles and vaccines, Canada can’t keep ignoring the elephant in the room
Study after study has shown that political affiliation is one of the single strongest predictors of vaccination status.
www.thestar.com
November 14, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Reposted by stealingsand
This has gotten surprisingly little attention — it's not even on the front page of @science.org right now — but it's really hard to describe what the SAFE Research Act would do to US science and scientists without sounding insane

www.science.org/content/arti...
November 14, 2025 at 5:16 PM