Serious Freud Office
@seriousfreudoffice.bsky.social
Paid shill for Big Mood.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
also, everyone is really weird about gender and sexuality these days. “i’ve noticed trans women tend to have psychosexual hangups” did you notice how cis dudes are doing? like sincerely, fretting about if you’re a freak is so pointless when we live in this moment
November 11, 2025 at 8:30 AM
also, everyone is really weird about gender and sexuality these days. “i’ve noticed trans women tend to have psychosexual hangups” did you notice how cis dudes are doing? like sincerely, fretting about if you’re a freak is so pointless when we live in this moment
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
if you see a bird art share your bird art...
well seeing as you asked
"crow steals the sun" linoprint
shop.frankduffy.co.uk/product/crow...
well seeing as you asked
"crow steals the sun" linoprint
shop.frankduffy.co.uk/product/crow...
November 10, 2025 at 8:57 PM
if you see a bird art share your bird art...
well seeing as you asked
"crow steals the sun" linoprint
shop.frankduffy.co.uk/product/crow...
well seeing as you asked
"crow steals the sun" linoprint
shop.frankduffy.co.uk/product/crow...
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
No single US news source is consumed by more than 25% of Americans, whereas 60% of Brits regularly watch/read/listen to the BBC.
A single shared source of truth makes it harder for partisan echo chambers to form, or for divisive narratives to dominate. It’s good for social cohesion and compromise.
A single shared source of truth makes it harder for partisan echo chambers to form, or for divisive narratives to dominate. It’s good for social cohesion and compromise.
November 10, 2025 at 1:43 PM
No single US news source is consumed by more than 25% of Americans, whereas 60% of Brits regularly watch/read/listen to the BBC.
A single shared source of truth makes it harder for partisan echo chambers to form, or for divisive narratives to dominate. It’s good for social cohesion and compromise.
A single shared source of truth makes it harder for partisan echo chambers to form, or for divisive narratives to dominate. It’s good for social cohesion and compromise.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
we fight for freedom
November 10, 2025 at 4:05 PM
we fight for freedom
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
we should not be letting any company get away with blaming AI for their failures. I'm not even sure how we got to this point. people are like "it's just a tool" okay so is a forklift and we still hold somebody responsible when it goes wrong and hurts someone. this is YOUR AI!
November 10, 2025 at 4:05 PM
we should not be letting any company get away with blaming AI for their failures. I'm not even sure how we got to this point. people are like "it's just a tool" okay so is a forklift and we still hold somebody responsible when it goes wrong and hurts someone. this is YOUR AI!
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
a few months ago I said "having generative AI handle absolutely anything with regards to healthcare is a nightmare and should be banned" and a bunch of people made fun of me and called me stupid. anyways,
November 10, 2025 at 4:00 PM
a few months ago I said "having generative AI handle absolutely anything with regards to healthcare is a nightmare and should be banned" and a bunch of people made fun of me and called me stupid. anyways,
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
A reminder that this anti-trans panic is 100% bullshit and exactly none of our country’s problems are related to someone expressing their gender identity and everyone who isn’t a hate-filled weirdo knows it.
November 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
A reminder that this anti-trans panic is 100% bullshit and exactly none of our country’s problems are related to someone expressing their gender identity and everyone who isn’t a hate-filled weirdo knows it.
I hate statistics sometimes...
November 10, 2025 at 1:21 PM
I hate statistics sometimes...
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
Maybe Keir should demand the heads of major US news networks any time they imply Britain is on the brink of civil war or that we live under sharia law. Or does it not work both ways?
November 10, 2025 at 11:29 AM
Maybe Keir should demand the heads of major US news networks any time they imply Britain is on the brink of civil war or that we live under sharia law. Or does it not work both ways?
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
The Trump Administration is now pushing Brits to watch GB News instead of the BBC. The Far Right are trying to seize this moment of chaos in British media.
November 10, 2025 at 10:46 AM
The Trump Administration is now pushing Brits to watch GB News instead of the BBC. The Far Right are trying to seize this moment of chaos in British media.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
And again. One of Murdoch's mates having the *opinion* that the BBC isn't transphobic enough (ah ha ha ha to make a hollow laughing) is treated as far more worth listening to than any of our complaints.
Someday, I'd like an MP to stand up in parliament and ask why the *opinions* of a small subset of cisgender people matter more to this government than the safety, health, and dignity of every transgender person in the country.
November 10, 2025 at 10:14 AM
And again. One of Murdoch's mates having the *opinion* that the BBC isn't transphobic enough (ah ha ha ha to make a hollow laughing) is treated as far more worth listening to than any of our complaints.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
Notable that the supposedly “patriotic” wing of British politics wants to destroy / defund almost all of our national institutions
November 10, 2025 at 8:19 AM
Notable that the supposedly “patriotic” wing of British politics wants to destroy / defund almost all of our national institutions
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
The Telegraph’s BBC “memo” isn’t evidence of anything except how far bad-faith actors will go to keep trans people’s existence a debate topic.
It’s not whistle-blowing. It’s a culture-war press release with the insidious intention of making BBC coverage even MORE transphobic than it currently is! 😖
It’s not whistle-blowing. It’s a culture-war press release with the insidious intention of making BBC coverage even MORE transphobic than it currently is! 😖
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
The Telegraph’s BBC “memo” isn’t evidence of anything except how far bad-faith actors will go to keep trans people’s existence a debate topic.
It’s not whistle-blowing. It’s a culture-war press release with the insidious intention of making BBC coverage even MORE transphobic than it currently is! 😖
It’s not whistle-blowing. It’s a culture-war press release with the insidious intention of making BBC coverage even MORE transphobic than it currently is! 😖
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
Every time these “dossiers” appear, the pattern is the same:
- Anonymous claims.
- GC buzzwords about “Stonewall law”
- A Telegraph headline declaring crisis.
- Calls for “heads to roll.”
Manufactured outrage to keep trans lives framed as controversy.
- Anonymous claims.
- GC buzzwords about “Stonewall law”
- A Telegraph headline declaring crisis.
- Calls for “heads to roll.”
Manufactured outrage to keep trans lives framed as controversy.
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Every time these “dossiers” appear, the pattern is the same:
- Anonymous claims.
- GC buzzwords about “Stonewall law”
- A Telegraph headline declaring crisis.
- Calls for “heads to roll.”
Manufactured outrage to keep trans lives framed as controversy.
- Anonymous claims.
- GC buzzwords about “Stonewall law”
- A Telegraph headline declaring crisis.
- Calls for “heads to roll.”
Manufactured outrage to keep trans lives framed as controversy.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
Let’s be clear: there is no evidence of censorship or editorial breach. Just a demand that the BBC treat equality itself as a “debate.”
That’s not balance. That’s bias - the kind that hurts real people.
That’s not balance. That’s bias - the kind that hurts real people.
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Let’s be clear: there is no evidence of censorship or editorial breach. Just a demand that the BBC treat equality itself as a “debate.”
That’s not balance. That’s bias - the kind that hurts real people.
That’s not balance. That’s bias - the kind that hurts real people.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
What the dossier really offers is a political weapon: a way for the Telegraph, ‘gender critical’ transphobes, and the right-wing press to scream “BBC captured by the woke lobby” and crank the culture war back up.
It’s not journalism. It’s Propaganda! 😖
It’s not journalism. It’s Propaganda! 😖
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
What the dossier really offers is a political weapon: a way for the Telegraph, ‘gender critical’ transphobes, and the right-wing press to scream “BBC captured by the woke lobby” and crank the culture war back up.
It’s not journalism. It’s Propaganda! 😖
It’s not journalism. It’s Propaganda! 😖
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
There’s a deeper trick here. He calls respectful coverage of trans lives “bias,” then demands “balance” by platforming anti-trans voices (ignoring that BBC policy won’t allow trans voices without GC ones too!)
That’s the same old “I’ve been silenced because I can’t be transphobic on air” routine.
That’s the same old “I’ve been silenced because I can’t be transphobic on air” routine.
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
There’s a deeper trick here. He calls respectful coverage of trans lives “bias,” then demands “balance” by platforming anti-trans voices (ignoring that BBC policy won’t allow trans voices without GC ones too!)
That’s the same old “I’ve been silenced because I can’t be transphobic on air” routine.
That’s the same old “I’ve been silenced because I can’t be transphobic on air” routine.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
He then lists “evidence” of bias:
– a positive feature on trans wrestler Gisele Shaw
– too few stories about detransitioners
– too many stories about drag queens
– the use of the phrase “assigned at birth”
That’s not analysis. It’s Twitter discourse dressed up as whistle-blowing!
– a positive feature on trans wrestler Gisele Shaw
– too few stories about detransitioners
– too many stories about drag queens
– the use of the phrase “assigned at birth”
That’s not analysis. It’s Twitter discourse dressed up as whistle-blowing!
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
He then lists “evidence” of bias:
– a positive feature on trans wrestler Gisele Shaw
– too few stories about detransitioners
– too many stories about drag queens
– the use of the phrase “assigned at birth”
That’s not analysis. It’s Twitter discourse dressed up as whistle-blowing!
– a positive feature on trans wrestler Gisele Shaw
– too few stories about detransitioners
– too many stories about drag queens
– the use of the phrase “assigned at birth”
That’s not analysis. It’s Twitter discourse dressed up as whistle-blowing!
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
So the Telegraph’s “BBC bias dossier” - supposedly written by ex-BBC adviser Michael Prescott - is being used to claim there’s a rogue LGBT+ unit “censoring” gender-critical voices inside the BBC.
Let’s look at what’s actually in it. Spoiler: it’s nothing but recycled transphobic talking points!
🧵
Let’s look at what’s actually in it. Spoiler: it’s nothing but recycled transphobic talking points!
🧵
For reference - Here’s the Telegraph article with the Prescott memo complaining about the BBC published in FULL.
Obviously, it’s an archived link which circumvents their paywall - as there’s no way I’m gonna give that transphobic rag any clicks or coin! 😣
👉 archive.ph/mJIsB
Obviously, it’s an archived link which circumvents their paywall - as there’s no way I’m gonna give that transphobic rag any clicks or coin! 😣
👉 archive.ph/mJIsB
November 10, 2025 at 2:27 AM
So the Telegraph’s “BBC bias dossier” - supposedly written by ex-BBC adviser Michael Prescott - is being used to claim there’s a rogue LGBT+ unit “censoring” gender-critical voices inside the BBC.
Let’s look at what’s actually in it. Spoiler: it’s nothing but recycled transphobic talking points!
🧵
Let’s look at what’s actually in it. Spoiler: it’s nothing but recycled transphobic talking points!
🧵
The truth needs neither apology nor balance, because it is true.
November 10, 2025 at 10:22 AM
The truth needs neither apology nor balance, because it is true.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
No he wasn't. That's not true. He was lying to put the boot in because he knew he could say any old shit, and the rules of engagement would mean everyone would have to take this incredibly seriously and probably go further.
Michael Prescott was ‘“shocked” that after an hour-long Panorama documentary dealing with Trump and the January 6 insurgency, there was no “similar, balancing” programme about Kamala Harris.’
More read about the machinations between the BBC resignations, the more worrying it becomes
More read about the machinations between the BBC resignations, the more worrying it becomes
The departure of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness means the BBC is leaderless when it needs leadership more than ever. Where are the people at the head of the BBC standing up for it?
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
November 10, 2025 at 10:16 AM
No he wasn't. That's not true. He was lying to put the boot in because he knew he could say any old shit, and the rules of engagement would mean everyone would have to take this incredibly seriously and probably go further.
Reposted by Serious Freud Office
there are too many people out there who thought "TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS" is a statement of principle, not a warning. And then too many of those who got that it means "what they will do to trans rights, they will do to all human rights" were all like "don't be silly, Neimoller's just a poem."
November 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM
there are too many people out there who thought "TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS" is a statement of principle, not a warning. And then too many of those who got that it means "what they will do to trans rights, they will do to all human rights" were all like "don't be silly, Neimoller's just a poem."
To hell with the accusations of bias. Trump clearly and obviously encouraged the attempted January 6th coup, and Panorama were right to say so.
I’m struggling to see the bias still. It’s a matter of public record that he tried to use a violent mob to stop the legal certification of Joe Biden.
November 10, 2025 at 10:13 AM
To hell with the accusations of bias. Trump clearly and obviously encouraged the attempted January 6th coup, and Panorama were right to say so.