Text SIGN PGPZJY to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN PBSHPY to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN PNWJFG to 50409 — I am urging you to stop the Department of Education’s attempt to quietly redefine “professional degrees” in a way that strips nursing, education, social work, audiology, public health, and other essential fields of their longstanding professional status. This change will limit students’ access to federal loan programs and choke off the talent pipeline for critically important jobs. But it is also clear this is part of a larger effort to break apart the Department and shift its financial responsibilities to private contractors and politically connected firms. That is the opposite of fiscal responsibility. It opens the door to waste, abuse, and sweetheart deals — exactly the kind of Washington insider behavior voters across the political spectrum rejected. Multiple reports confirm that the Department is already pushing major programs into agencies with no education mission. At the same time, they’re attempting to downgrade entire fields that overwhelmingly serve our communities: nurses, teachers, speech-language pathologists, social workers, and public-health professionals. These fields rely on advanced degrees and specialized training. Calling these degrees “non-professional” doesn’t make sense unless the goal is to make sure fewer students qualify for federal support — which in turn shrinks the public workforce and weakens the Department’s internal capacity. When federal expertise dries up, the next step is predictable: contract the work out. And in recent years we’ve seen how “reorganizations” in multiple agencies have led to expensive no-bid or limited-bid contracts, often handed to firms with close political ties. It creates a system where taxpayers pay more and get less, while insiders profit. This reclassification also hits the workforce that American families depend on: • Nursing: We face a nationwide shortage that affects hospitals, clinics, and veterans’ care. • Teaching: Schools everywhere struggle to hire qualified educators, especially in special education and STEM. • Public health and social work: These fields support seniors, veterans, children, and families in crisis. Reducing the ability of students to train for these jobs is not conservative, it’s not constitutional, and it’s not smart policy. It weakens national preparedness, undermines local communities, and forces states to shoulder even greater burdens. I’m asking Congress to: 1. Nullify the Department’s redefinition of “professional degrees” and restore long-standing standards recognized by accreditation and licensing bodies. 2. Ensure that federal student-aid programs cannot be privatized or outsourced without clear congressional approval. 3. Stop any attempt to dismantle the Department of Education through piecemeal actions that force essential functions into private hands. 4. Protect taxpayers by preventing back-room contracting, no-bid deals, and giveaways to political insiders. This issue should unite all sides: we need transparency, accountability, and a stable workforce in the fields that keep our communities strong. Congress must make sure no agency can hollow itself out and hand its responsibilities to private interests without oversight. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Text SIGN PNWJFG to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN PBRGJJ to 50409 — Your recent emergency order halting full SNAP payments during the government shutdown places this Court at the center of a growing constitutional and moral crisis. Issued late on a Friday night, without argument or opinion, the order once again uses the “shadow docket” to shape national policy in darkness. The lower courts found that Congress had already appropriated funds for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and that the administration’s refusal to release those funds violated both statutory authority and the duty to protect the public interest. Yet this Court chose to intervene—not to clarify the law, but to pause relief for 41 million Americans who depend on those benefits to eat. Under traditional precedent, a stay should issue only when the applicant shows a likelihood of success, irreparable harm, and that the balance of equities favors intervention. The government’s claim of “irreparable harm” here—that it might not be able to claw back money once poor Americans receive food aid—turns equity on its head. Feeding the hungry cannot be construed as harm. Justice Jackson’s narrowly drawn administrative stay, limited to 48 hours after the First Circuit’s ruling, reflects respect for process and a good-faith effort to prevent a worse outcome—a permanent freeze by the full Court. But the broader trend is unmistakable: the Court’s growing reliance on emergency orders, without transparency or reasoning, undermines faith in its impartiality and tarnishes its legitimacy. This Court has long recognized, in cases from Winter v. NRDC to Nken v. Holder, that equitable relief must weigh the human cost of delay. The harm here is not theoretical—it is hunger, deprivation, and despair among millions of Americans, including children, the elderly, veterans, and the disabled. The Court should act swiftly to restore the lower courts’ orders, reaffirm that Congress’s appropriations must be honored, and reject the dangerous idea that executive preference can override the basic right to food. To preserve both its integrity and the rule of law, this Court must step out of the shadows and let the light of justice reach the people it serves.