Jill ONeill
jillmwo.bsky.social
Jill ONeill
@jillmwo.bsky.social
Only semi-retired from the information industry. I read a lot and across multiple subject areas. All opinions my own. Likes indicate interest rather than endorsement.
Reposted by Jill ONeill
I wrote an essay for @bostonreview.bsky.social about what I learned about close reading when I taught at West Virginia University

www.bostonreview.net/articles/the...
The Claims of Close Reading - Boston Review
Literary studies have been starved by austerity, but their core methodology remains radical.
www.bostonreview.net
November 26, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Now the problem is "device-hoarding". People are holding on to their smart phones for a horrifying 29 months rather than upgrading! Legacy tech is a problem, granted, but how sustainable is it to expect upgrades on hardware every two years? www.cnbc.com/2025/11/23/h...
Americans are holding onto devices longer than ever and it's costing the economy
Americans are holding onto devices longer than ever before, and while it may be consumer smart, it comes at a cost to work productivity and the U.S. economy.
www.cnbc.com
November 26, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Doing all I could this morning to keep the few undergrads who even turned up awake, & even this ghastly but interesting image, a prop to my discussion of the female Gothic & "Get Out" didn't quite do the job.
So I'll try with YOU.
It's an illustration to Bluebeard by Winslow Homer, of all people.
November 24, 2025 at 9:45 PM
This is an amazing (and most worthwhile) virtual experience.
How the Getty Provenance Index is transforming art research.
[🧵1/10]
November 25, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Comin' atcha with a trunk full of updates! November 2025 edition features the latest buzz in the Resource Sharing pilot, 19 million items, the Member Meeting recording and more. #trusty #digitallibraries
November 25, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Our executive director Peter Berkery responds, "The education of student interns is an additional benefit of university-based publishing initiatives, not a substitute for the essential function that university presses play in the curation and advancement of the scholarly record." bit.ly/47HnLF3
November 24, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Are we reading, watching, or listening to the news? www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/... Admittedly, no real surprises here.
More Americans prefer to watch the news than read or listen to it
A majority of Americans who prefer to watch the news (62%) say they prefer to get it from TV, rather than another platform.
www.pewresearch.org
November 24, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Interesting thread here...
The uncomfortable truth about mandatory publications for PhD students

There’s a point in this debate that many people tiptoe around: mandatory publication doesn’t just create pressure, it also creates inequality.
🧵
November 23, 2025 at 3:46 PM
The most important point from this article is this quote: "We ignore research infrastructures at our peril." Pay attention to what's happening with the British Library. www.cityam.com/the-british-...
The British library is in crisis: why does nobody care?
The widespread indifference to the British Library's crippling cyberattack demonstrates a perilous failure to value the knowledge infrastructure vital for national prosperity
www.cityam.com
November 21, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Word of the day is ‘quockerwodger’ (19th century): a puppet politician whose strings are pulled entirely by someone else.
November 21, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Lyrasis, the Big Ten Academic Alliance Center for Library Programs and the California Digital Library have been awarded a grant to advance community-governed, open access scholarly publishing in the United States. Read more about the #DiamondOA mapping project here, https://ow.ly/QCKC50Xu6vU.
November 19, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Meet Merrilee Proffitt, Director of Democracy’s Library US (Internet Archive)
blog.archive.org/2025/11/18/m...
Meet Merrilee Proffitt, Director of Democracy’s Library US | Internet Archive Blogs
blog.archive.org
November 18, 2025 at 8:32 PM
ICYMI: AI Chatbots are prolific letter-writers to the detriment of the scientific publishing process. (Nov 4, 2025, NYTimes Gift Article) www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/s...
The Editor Got a Letter From ‘Dr. B.S.’ So Did a Lot of Other Editors.
www.nytimes.com
November 18, 2025 at 7:18 PM
“We’re Good at Search”… Just Not the Kind That the AI era Demands - a Provocation
open.substack.com/pub/aarontay...
“We’re Good at Search”… Just Not the Kind That the AI era Demands - a Provocation
I might be exaggerating slightly, but if you look at the few new evaluation matrices for AI-powered search circulating, “relevancy” is often just one of several categories, evaluated in a highly subje...
open.substack.com
November 15, 2025 at 2:23 PM
As noted in the piece, "We need to rethink the ecosystem, and the incentives that are applied...Too many submissions are funnelled through a limited pool of reviewers, creating unsustainable workloads and threatening the effectiveness, speed and fairness of peer review."
November 12, 2025 at 7:22 PM
This one might cause many of us to clutch our pearls. www.axios.com/2025/11/12/c...
Meet chatbot Jesus: How churches are using AI to save souls
Chatbots answer prayers and algorithms write sermons.
www.axios.com
November 12, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Legal filing with the Supreme Court by Copyright Office's Sherla Perlmutter seeks to overturn her removal by current administration. rollcall.com/2025/11/10/c...
Copyright Office head asks Supreme Court to keep her in role - Roll Call
Filing is the latest battle in war over whether the head of copyright office can remain in office despite Trump firing her.
rollcall.com
November 11, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Reformation of Science Publishing: "It is high time to reevaluate current publishing models and outline a global plan" that over time will ensure trustworthiness and integrity. Worth a read. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration | Royal Society Open Science
Science relies on integrity and trustworthiness. But scientists under career pressure are lured to purchase fake publications from ‘paper mills’ that use AI-generated data, text and image fabrication....
royalsocietypublishing.org
November 6, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
IT’S ELECTION DAY, AMERICA!

Remember to get out and VOTE!!!
November 4, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
British Library Chief Executive steps down after less than a year: www.bl.uk/about/press/...
British Library Board statement
The British Library Board has announced that Rebecca Lawrence has stepped down as Chief Executive.
www.bl.uk
November 4, 2025 at 3:32 PM
It's not about agreeing with it or disagreeing with it. This is a must-read. It's indicative of a particular mindset associated with preparing for an AI-driven digital information environment.
Readers don't browse anymore. They interrogate.

"What's the latest guidance?"
"Which methodology should I use?"
"How does this affect my work?"

If your content isn't answer-ready, it's invisible—to AI systems & to readers.
What scholarly publishers need to know → blog.hum.works/posts/when-c...
When Content Finds the Reader
Readers now expect AI to deliver answers, not links. Learn how scholarly publishers can stay visible and trusted in answer-first search experiences.
blog.hum.works
November 4, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Catch the replay of Delta Think’s 2025 Market Sizing Update and dig into the data behind shifting business models and what’s next for OA.

🎥 www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lcU...

Stay ahead of the trends — subscribe to DAT for continuous insights and updates.

#OA #ScholComm #DeltaThinkData
2025 Delta Think Market Sizing Webinar
YouTube video by Delta Think Open Access Data & Analytics Tool
www.youtube.com
November 3, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Reposted by Jill ONeill
Reposted by Jill ONeill
This does not surprise me at all. What did surprise me was someone at lunch saying he didn't realize that #scholarlypublishing was having to spend so much time and effort weeding out fake #AI generated papers. & arXiv has fewer staff to deal with this than groups such as Springer Nature Publishing.
arXiv will no longer accept review articles and position papers unless they have been accepted at a journal or a conference and complete successful peer review.

This is due to being overwhelmed by a hundreds of AI generated papers a month.

Yet another open submission process killed by LLMs.
Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category – arXiv blog
blog.arxiv.org
November 2, 2025 at 5:17 AM
Quote: "This generation of AI is the most transformative technology we’ve seen since the Internet, and it’s enabling companies to innovate much faster than ever before." Well, that's one way of rationalizing it.
November 1, 2025 at 7:20 PM