Tech x Urbanism @ https://www.urbanproxima.com/
Yimby Politics @ https://inpractice.yimbyaction.org/
There's the obvious YIMBY angle, but there's also a Georgist one, something about regulatory arbitrage, something about placemaking, and even a bit about the politics of reconciliation.
There's the obvious YIMBY angle, but there's also a Georgist one, something about regulatory arbitrage, something about placemaking, and even a bit about the politics of reconciliation.
As we move forward, we're going to see more and more attempts to represent laws, regulations, and ordinances as structured data (exactly what zlvas is doing for NYC land use)
As we move forward, we're going to see more and more attempts to represent laws, regulations, and ordinances as structured data (exactly what zlvas is doing for NYC land use)
Big question is how many homes per lot.
Will it be a handful of large 2,000 sq ft+ houses, or will a larger number of smaller starter homes or flats also be allowed.
For best results we want flexibility for either. 1/
#berkmtg
...an lvt would fix this
...an lvt would fix this
Edmonton edition. One house hiding in the trees to...
Fourplex!
Edmonton edition. One house hiding in the trees to...
Fourplex!
But now, that's changed, as homeowners in those states have mastered the art of blocking development, too.
The result? Prices are spiking.
But now, that's changed, as homeowners in those states have mastered the art of blocking development, too.
The result? Prices are spiking.
The proximal cause of American NIMBYism is a small-c conservative aversion to change. We need to reacclimatize people to the idea that growth is good and development is normal — missing middle housing will help us do that.
More than anything, we're fighting status quo bias.
The proximal cause of American NIMBYism is a small-c conservative aversion to change. We need to reacclimatize people to the idea that growth is good and development is normal — missing middle housing will help us do that.
More than anything, we're fighting status quo bias.
It was one of the better conversations I've ever had with an elected, both on the what as well as the why.
It was one of the better conversations I've ever had with an elected, both on the what as well as the why.
Overall verdict?
Overall verdict?