Nondescript.
LightNews LightNews
imaginaryperson222.bsky.social
Nondescript.
@imaginaryperson222.bsky.social
270 followers 480 following 47 posts
A person on the planet. Not a bot. Beep boop.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Nondescript.
lordaslan.bsky.social
gm
November 28, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
evanurquhart.bsky.social
TL;DR maybe you don't have to turn off smart features in Gmail after all
ernie.tedium.co Ernie Smith @ernie.tedium.co · 9d
If you have been sharing that Malwarebytes article on the Gmail thing, you should note the giant correction up top.

www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/20...
Update November 22. We’ve updated this article after realising we contributed to a perfect storm of misunderstanding around a recent change in the wording and placement of Gmail’s smart features. The settings themselves aren’t new, but the way Google recently rewrote and surfaced them led a lot of people (including us) to believe Gmail content might be used to train Google’s AI models, and that users were being opted in automatically. After taking a closer look at Google’s documentation and reviewing other reporting, that doesn’t appear to be the case. Gmail does scan email content to power its own “smart features,” such as spam filtering, categorisation, and writing suggestions. But this is part of how Gmail normally works and isn’t the same as training Google’s generative AI models. Google also maintains that these feature settings are opt-in rather than opt-out, although users’ experiences seem to vary depending on when and how the new wording appeared. It’s easy to see where the confusion came from. Google’s updated language around “smart features” is vague, and the term “smart” often implies AI—especially at a time when Gemini is being integrated into other parts of Google’s products. When the new wording started appearing for some users without much explanation, many assumed it signalled a broader shift. We’ve revised this article to reflect what we can confirm from Google’s documentation, as it’s always been our aim to give readers accurate, helpful guidance.
November 22, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
chrismurphyct.bsky.social
The President of the United States just called for Democratic members of Congress to be executed. "HANG THEM", he posted.

If you're a person of influence in this country and you haven't picked a side, maybe now would be the time to pick a fucking side.
November 20, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
jongraywb.bsky.social
Not to yuck peoples yum but if they can let Patton Oswalt back in for doing the exact same damn thing then they can also reinstate Link.
pattonoswalt.bsky.social Patton Oswalt @pattonoswalt.bsky.social · 14d
First off, my suspension has ended. Got a little harsh with a post a few days ago but I didn’t have my feet on the ground and I’m sorry if I offended anyone. Will try to be more chipper. Knock on wood!
November 17, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
esquiring.bsky.social
if your moderation team bans someone for a harmless unactionable exclamation of disgust, but permits a govt account to say stuff like this,

you need a new moderation team.
Dept. of War [sic]'s bluesky account says "To all narco-terrorists who threaten our homeland: If you keep trafficking deadly drugs–we will kill you."
November 14, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
numb.comfortab.ly
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME BLUESKY
Patton Oswalt account is suspended
November 14, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
nowarbutclasswar.bsky.social
I like how @safety.bsky.app is all "pedophiles have a right to be heard"
November 14, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Reposted by Nondescript.
sbworkersunited.org
As of this morning, Starbucks workers across the country are officially ON STRIKE. And we're prepared for this to become the biggest and longest ULP strike in Starbucks history.

Say #NoContractNoCoffee with us: DON'T BUY STARBUCKS for the duration of our open-ended ULP strike! $SBUX
Don't Buy Starbucks! At any location, today and beyond, while workers are on ULP strike!
November 13, 2025 at 11:33 AM
imaginaryperson222.bsky.social
@kaine.senate.gov

Looks like you got hosed. Again.
atrupar.com Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 19d
Q: Is there anything in the deal to stop the mass firings?

EMMER: No. The president is not gonna bring back the people they fired. They were unnecessary.

Q: So some of the Russ Vought stuff will stick?

EMMER: All of the stuff they've done is sticking.
November 12, 2025 at 8:39 PM