Malin
@hallihallomalin.bsky.social
Reposted by Malin
So many of these type of posts again passing by.
Non-experts claiming a non-expert is "right".
Problem is, where is the evidence of that "right". There is none, and experts see through that, immediately, from 2020.
Non-experts claiming a non-expert is "right".
Problem is, where is the evidence of that "right". There is none, and experts see through that, immediately, from 2020.
I paid close attention to AJ Leonardi in the other place. Right from the get go he hammered on about T cell damage.
So many people tried to discredit him (looking at you Zeynap). But I believe his observations have substance. #ImmunityLost
Great read from @thetyee.ca
thetyee.ca/Analysis/202...
So many people tried to discredit him (looking at you Zeynap). But I believe his observations have substance. #ImmunityLost
Great read from @thetyee.ca
thetyee.ca/Analysis/202...
What If COVID Reinfections Wear Down Our Immunity? | The Tyee
Dr. Anthony Leonardi is a lightning rod for debate. If he’s right, this pandemic poses a greater threat than widely assumed.
thetyee.ca
November 11, 2025 at 2:37 PM
So many of these type of posts again passing by.
Non-experts claiming a non-expert is "right".
Problem is, where is the evidence of that "right". There is none, and experts see through that, immediately, from 2020.
Non-experts claiming a non-expert is "right".
Problem is, where is the evidence of that "right". There is none, and experts see through that, immediately, from 2020.
Reposted by Malin
The paper “COVID-19 is ‘Airborne AIDS’” is activism, not science. It uses fear-laden imagery to provoke emotion. No peer-reviewed data support a functional parallel between HIV’s chronic immune destruction and SARS-CoV-2 acute infection.
open.substack.com/pu...
1/5
open.substack.com/pu...
1/5
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
open.substack.com
October 19, 2025 at 10:19 AM
The paper “COVID-19 is ‘Airborne AIDS’” is activism, not science. It uses fear-laden imagery to provoke emotion. No peer-reviewed data support a functional parallel between HIV’s chronic immune destruction and SARS-CoV-2 acute infection.
open.substack.com/pu...
1/5
open.substack.com/pu...
1/5
Reposted by Malin
There was a delay due to the approval of my account. But this "paper" is so bad and undermines scholarship, knowledge, expertise, science, truth and society so much, it had to be done. @ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social
PubPeer - COVID-19 is “Airborne AIDS”: provocative oversimplification,...
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: COVID-19 is “Airborne AIDS”: provocative oversimplification, emerging science, or something in between? (2025)
www.pubpeer.com
November 1, 2025 at 7:15 PM
There was a delay due to the approval of my account. But this "paper" is so bad and undermines scholarship, knowledge, expertise, science, truth and society so much, it had to be done. @ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social
Reposted by Malin
How unexpected, Harry Spoelstra, David Joffe and Zdenek Vrozina, fall for this nonsense. Why? Not because they understand it, not because they even read it or checked any of the references. The take it because it fits their Doom ideology. It is a cult.
bsky.app/profile/did...
1/2
bsky.app/profile/did...
1/2
October 30, 2025 at 8:32 PM
How unexpected, Harry Spoelstra, David Joffe and Zdenek Vrozina, fall for this nonsense. Why? Not because they understand it, not because they even read it or checked any of the references. The take it because it fits their Doom ideology. It is a cult.
bsky.app/profile/did...
1/2
bsky.app/profile/did...
1/2
Reposted by Malin
On X there is a very strange bird. It constantly spreads alarming posts, pretending to know something about infection and immunlogy. It does not.
What it does is scaning UKHSA data, cherry-picking and trying to produce graphs with that data, suggestive of something scary
1/10
What it does is scaning UKHSA data, cherry-picking and trying to produce graphs with that data, suggestive of something scary
1/10
October 27, 2025 at 4:23 PM
On X there is a very strange bird. It constantly spreads alarming posts, pretending to know something about infection and immunlogy. It does not.
What it does is scaning UKHSA data, cherry-picking and trying to produce graphs with that data, suggestive of something scary
1/10
What it does is scaning UKHSA data, cherry-picking and trying to produce graphs with that data, suggestive of something scary
1/10
Reposted by Malin
Say what?
This ignoramus is harming Science and people.
This papers shows that your immune response, particularly your T cells, respond very good and are on good shape after SARS-COV-2 infection! It provides good evidence there is no immune damage‼️
1/9
This ignoramus is harming Science and people.
This papers shows that your immune response, particularly your T cells, respond very good and are on good shape after SARS-COV-2 infection! It provides good evidence there is no immune damage‼️
1/9
October 26, 2025 at 5:44 PM
Say what?
This ignoramus is harming Science and people.
This papers shows that your immune response, particularly your T cells, respond very good and are on good shape after SARS-COV-2 infection! It provides good evidence there is no immune damage‼️
1/9
This ignoramus is harming Science and people.
This papers shows that your immune response, particularly your T cells, respond very good and are on good shape after SARS-COV-2 infection! It provides good evidence there is no immune damage‼️
1/9
Reposted by Malin
1️⃣ Stop the nonsense: COVID-19 is not “airborne AIDS.” 🤦♂️
SARS-CoV-2 does not cause generalized immune deficiency. Severe immune changes? Only in hospitalized patients, and they recover post-infection.
Full evidence breakdown:
open.substack.com/pu...
1/3
SARS-CoV-2 does not cause generalized immune deficiency. Severe immune changes? Only in hospitalized patients, and they recover post-infection.
Full evidence breakdown:
open.substack.com/pu...
1/3
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
open.substack.com
October 23, 2025 at 11:31 AM
1️⃣ Stop the nonsense: COVID-19 is not “airborne AIDS.” 🤦♂️
SARS-CoV-2 does not cause generalized immune deficiency. Severe immune changes? Only in hospitalized patients, and they recover post-infection.
Full evidence breakdown:
open.substack.com/pu...
1/3
SARS-CoV-2 does not cause generalized immune deficiency. Severe immune changes? Only in hospitalized patients, and they recover post-infection.
Full evidence breakdown:
open.substack.com/pu...
1/3
Reposted by Malin
When I saw that someone had published an absurd paper claiming that COVID-19 and HIV were comparable, I was going to do a deep dive.
But it turns out @marcveld.bsky.social already did it:
marcveldhoen.substack.com/p/the-abuse-...
But it turns out @marcveld.bsky.social already did it:
marcveldhoen.substack.com/p/the-abuse-...
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
October 23, 2025 at 1:38 AM
When I saw that someone had published an absurd paper claiming that COVID-19 and HIV were comparable, I was going to do a deep dive.
But it turns out @marcveld.bsky.social already did it:
marcveldhoen.substack.com/p/the-abuse-...
But it turns out @marcveld.bsky.social already did it:
marcveldhoen.substack.com/p/the-abuse-...
Reposted by Malin
The end is near. Only the Discussion and Conclusions.
It was, as a scientist, terrible to read. As a lay person, you may be taking in by it, but it is all BS what the WHN claim. None, really none of their claims are substantiated by scientific valid data
It was, as a scientist, terrible to read. As a lay person, you may be taking in by it, but it is all BS what the WHN claim. None, really none of their claims are substantiated by scientific valid data
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
October 21, 2025 at 1:02 PM
The end is near. Only the Discussion and Conclusions.
It was, as a scientist, terrible to read. As a lay person, you may be taking in by it, but it is all BS what the WHN claim. None, really none of their claims are substantiated by scientific valid data
It was, as a scientist, terrible to read. As a lay person, you may be taking in by it, but it is all BS what the WHN claim. None, really none of their claims are substantiated by scientific valid data
Reposted by Malin
They act indistinguishably from antivaxxers: no knowledge, no context, no reading, no understanding. So it must be a conspiracy; the government, Big Pharma, paid experts, anything but the possibility that they might simply be very wrong.
2/2
2/2
October 16, 2025 at 6:48 PM
They act indistinguishably from antivaxxers: no knowledge, no context, no reading, no understanding. So it must be a conspiracy; the government, Big Pharma, paid experts, anything but the possibility that they might simply be very wrong.
2/2
2/2
Reposted by Malin
I can´t believe any peer review was involved @ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social for this junk. The references used do not support, and often undermine, the claims made.
"Immune function after COVID-19 infections is characterised by increased risks of infections"
1/2
"Immune function after COVID-19 infections is characterised by increased risks of infections"
1/2
October 16, 2025 at 11:02 AM
I can´t believe any peer review was involved @ajpmonline.bsky.social, @ajpmfocus.bsky.social for this junk. The references used do not support, and often undermine, the claims made.
"Immune function after COVID-19 infections is characterised by increased risks of infections"
1/2
"Immune function after COVID-19 infections is characterised by increased risks of infections"
1/2
Reposted by Malin
This brings it only halfway! It has been hilarious reading, with moments of amazement at how little they understand, how mean they are in presenting a false narrative. But I may need a break for a little while before I can continue.
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/2
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/2
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
October 16, 2025 at 2:57 PM
This brings it only halfway! It has been hilarious reading, with moments of amazement at how little they understand, how mean they are in presenting a false narrative. But I may need a break for a little while before I can continue.
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/2
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/2
Reposted by Malin
Updated. There is so much misinformation, misinterpretation and overinterpretration as well as the WHN collective not having the basic understanding that I only made it halfway the first section: "Immune System Dysfunction in HIV and SARS-CoV-2: Parallels and Divergences"
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
October 15, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Updated. There is so much misinformation, misinterpretation and overinterpretration as well as the WHN collective not having the basic understanding that I only made it halfway the first section: "Immune System Dysfunction in HIV and SARS-CoV-2: Parallels and Divergences"
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
Reposted by Malin
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substack.com
October 14, 2025 at 9:20 PM
The abuse of science: the anti-science movement using cherry-picking to pretend SARS-CoV-2 has similar effects to HIV
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
How the "World Health Network" and all associated have lost even the last bit of credibility
marcveldhoen.substac...
1/3
Reposted by Malin
Truly bizarre how a bunch of non-specialists club together under the cosplay banner of the WHN, and push out anti-science pulp.
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmfocus.bsky.social
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and COVID-19 with AIDS is bizarre, false and harmful.
1/8
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmfocus.bsky.social
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and COVID-19 with AIDS is bizarre, false and harmful.
1/8
October 14, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Truly bizarre how a bunch of non-specialists club together under the cosplay banner of the WHN, and push out anti-science pulp.
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmfocus.bsky.social
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and COVID-19 with AIDS is bizarre, false and harmful.
1/8
@ajpmonline.bsky.social
@ajpmfocus.bsky.social
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with HIV and COVID-19 with AIDS is bizarre, false and harmful.
1/8
Reposted by Malin
Post-COVID-19 condition in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in autumn 2023 in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study with pre- and post-infection data
Risk of LongCovid is not noticable above background after 2023.
www.sciencedirect.co...
1/6
Risk of LongCovid is not noticable above background after 2023.
www.sciencedirect.co...
1/6
Post-COVID-19 condition in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in autumn 2023 in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study with pre- and post-infection data
Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) risk may have changed due to vaccination status, virus variants, prior infections, and other factors. We aimed to estima…
www.sciencedirect.com
October 10, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Post-COVID-19 condition in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in autumn 2023 in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study with pre- and post-infection data
Risk of LongCovid is not noticable above background after 2023.
www.sciencedirect.co...
1/6
Risk of LongCovid is not noticable above background after 2023.
www.sciencedirect.co...
1/6
Reposted by Malin
I’ve been saying this many times: challenge what they claim, what the words they’re using mean. Ask them to define them, to provide evidence from good primary literature, and let them explain what is good, why, and what it means.
Antivax and Zerocovid use the same tactics
1/2
Antivax and Zerocovid use the same tactics
1/2
October 10, 2025 at 2:56 PM
I’ve been saying this many times: challenge what they claim, what the words they’re using mean. Ask them to define them, to provide evidence from good primary literature, and let them explain what is good, why, and what it means.
Antivax and Zerocovid use the same tactics
1/2
Antivax and Zerocovid use the same tactics
1/2
Reposted by Malin
No, Harry, you fail again to read and understand. In a subgroup of moderate-severe COVID-19 patients, without any prior immunity (1st wave!), some may take a little longer to fully recover lymphocyte numbers (particularly B cells) in the blood. No prior numbers known, age is different, etc.
October 9, 2025 at 1:18 PM
No, Harry, you fail again to read and understand. In a subgroup of moderate-severe COVID-19 patients, without any prior immunity (1st wave!), some may take a little longer to fully recover lymphocyte numbers (particularly B cells) in the blood. No prior numbers known, age is different, etc.
Reposted by Malin
The post below is important. It shows how difficult it is to put literature into context, how titles and media headlines can lead you to misunderstand, how others can convince you, because paper, published, peer-reviewed, etc.
bsky.app/profile/sbs...
1/10
bsky.app/profile/sbs...
1/10
Isn't there mounting scientific evidence for brain damage? How am I supposed to interpret this sort of research?
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
October 7, 2025 at 9:29 PM
The post below is important. It shows how difficult it is to put literature into context, how titles and media headlines can lead you to misunderstand, how others can convince you, because paper, published, peer-reviewed, etc.
bsky.app/profile/sbs...
1/10
bsky.app/profile/sbs...
1/10
Reposted by Malin
Kans op long covid door corona-infectie na pandemie is veel kleiner
The chance of long Covid due to corona infection after the pandemic is much smaller
The chance of long Covid due to corona infection after the pandemic is much smaller
Kans op long covid door corona-infectie na pandemie is veel kleiner
De kans dat iemand long covid krijgt door een infectie opgelopen na de coronapandemie is erg klein, blijkt uit onderzoek van het RIVM. Onderzoekers zien na een infectie nauwelijks nog verschil in gezondheidsklachten tussen besmette en niet-besmette mensen.
www.nu.nl
October 7, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Kans op long covid door corona-infectie na pandemie is veel kleiner
The chance of long Covid due to corona infection after the pandemic is much smaller
The chance of long Covid due to corona infection after the pandemic is much smaller
Reposted by Malin
There was no lymphopenia, no superantigen, no immune damage/dysfunction/exhaustion. There are no large outbreaks of infections. Furthermore, there are no increases in cancers due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, no compounded risk of longCovid, etc.
Now it is brain damage 🤦♂️
1/2
Now it is brain damage 🤦♂️
1/2
October 7, 2025 at 2:40 PM
There was no lymphopenia, no superantigen, no immune damage/dysfunction/exhaustion. There are no large outbreaks of infections. Furthermore, there are no increases in cancers due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, no compounded risk of longCovid, etc.
Now it is brain damage 🤦♂️
1/2
Now it is brain damage 🤦♂️
1/2
Reposted by Malin
Claiming “no study shows repeat COVID is harmless” flips science on its head. The burden of proof is on those claiming harm. Data from millions show no cumulative immune or organ damage; reinfections are milder thanks to hybrid and vaccine immunity.
1/4
1/4
October 5, 2025 at 10:04 AM
Claiming “no study shows repeat COVID is harmless” flips science on its head. The burden of proof is on those claiming harm. Data from millions show no cumulative immune or organ damage; reinfections are milder thanks to hybrid and vaccine immunity.
1/4
1/4
Reposted by Malin
With the viral season upon us, the debate over vaccination will flare up again.
It remains strange to watch: the advantages are many, well established, and increasingly better supported by evidence, including benefits against non-communicable diseases.
1/10
It remains strange to watch: the advantages are many, well established, and increasingly better supported by evidence, including benefits against non-communicable diseases.
1/10
September 19, 2025 at 2:14 PM
With the viral season upon us, the debate over vaccination will flare up again.
It remains strange to watch: the advantages are many, well established, and increasingly better supported by evidence, including benefits against non-communicable diseases.
1/10
It remains strange to watch: the advantages are many, well established, and increasingly better supported by evidence, including benefits against non-communicable diseases.
1/10
Reposted by Malin
COVID-19 infection associated with increased risk of new-onset vascular dementia in adults ≥50 years
Like most infections, from influenza to chickenpox, also SARS-CoV-2 can speed up or contribute to dementia. This is not unique to SARS-CoV-2.
www.nature.com/artic...
1/5
Like most infections, from influenza to chickenpox, also SARS-CoV-2 can speed up or contribute to dementia. This is not unique to SARS-CoV-2.
www.nature.com/artic...
1/5
COVID-19 infection associated with increased risk of new-onset vascular dementia in adults ≥50 years
npj Dementia - COVID-19 infection associated with increased risk of new-onset vascular dementia in adults ≥50 years
www.nature.com
October 4, 2025 at 5:41 PM
COVID-19 infection associated with increased risk of new-onset vascular dementia in adults ≥50 years
Like most infections, from influenza to chickenpox, also SARS-CoV-2 can speed up or contribute to dementia. This is not unique to SARS-CoV-2.
www.nature.com/artic...
1/5
Like most infections, from influenza to chickenpox, also SARS-CoV-2 can speed up or contribute to dementia. This is not unique to SARS-CoV-2.
www.nature.com/artic...
1/5
Reposted by Malin
A few comments on this study which finds a doubling of long covid risk with reinfections in children.
1/
1/
Children and teens who had a Covid reinfection had a doubling of #LongCovid risk (PASC) and a significant increase in many other adverse outcomes (Figure) www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
October 1, 2025 at 10:19 PM
A few comments on this study which finds a doubling of long covid risk with reinfections in children.
1/
1/