but
wtf is this data graphic
but
wtf is this data graphic
They are completely misrepresenting what most academics believe about AGI.
I detail some blunders here:
open.substack.com/pub/garymarc...
They are completely misrepresenting what most academics believe about AGI.
I detail some blunders here:
open.substack.com/pub/garymarc...
which NSF programs had their POs laid off? which NIH study sections have been allowed to proceed? have NoAs for non competing renewals been issued?
If it were March 2020 then academic twitter would know the answers. As it is, are we operating in the dark?
which NSF programs had their POs laid off? which NIH study sections have been allowed to proceed? have NoAs for non competing renewals been issued?
If it were March 2020 then academic twitter would know the answers. As it is, are we operating in the dark?
And I am a scientist because of the National Science Foundation.
A 🧵:
And I am a scientist because of the National Science Foundation.
A 🧵:
And it really resonates. such a good definition.
And it really resonates. such a good definition.
surely “keeping it real” means “on the real number line” (versus nominal, ie categorical) in this context?
these are dark days, the least we can do is over-explain our statistics jokes correctly
www.nytimes.com/2024/12/06/b...
surely “keeping it real” means “on the real number line” (versus nominal, ie categorical) in this context?
these are dark days, the least we can do is over-explain our statistics jokes correctly
www.nytimes.com/2024/12/06/b...
surely “keeping it real” means “on the real number line” (versus nominal, ie categorical) in this context?
these are dark days, the least we can do is over-explain our statistics jokes correctly
www.nytimes.com/2024/12/06/b...