and if you're reading this, it probably worked
Robert Griffin III claims the committee is “persecuting Christians” by ranking Notre Dame ahead of BYU
How are these claims falsifiable? It's the ever-looming Second Coming but for people who frequently posture as being "above" religion.
How are these claims falsifiable? It's the ever-looming Second Coming but for people who frequently posture as being "above" religion.
Majorities disapprove of his administration's actions on tariffs, cutting government, and eliminating DEI from government.
www.pewresearch.org/politics/202...
There hasn't been a more friendly political climate for sexual harassers in the last 30 years, but the proudly "antiwoke" news channel still doesn't want sexual harassers on staff. I wonder why?
There hasn't been a more friendly political climate for sexual harassers in the last 30 years, but the proudly "antiwoke" news channel still doesn't want sexual harassers on staff. I wonder why?
is it like "take me out to the ballgame" and everyone just knows the words and you're always going to hear it at a chocobo event?
is it like "take me out to the ballgame" and everyone just knows the words and you're always going to hear it at a chocobo event?
They did not "train" a model for $50.
They took an already-trained model (Qwen2.5) funded by a massive corporation (Alibaba) that cost tens-to-hundreds of millions of dollars and nudged it to do slightly better in a single domain.
The model, known as s1, performs similarly to cutting-edge reasoning models on tests measuring math and coding abilities.
Read more: tcrn.ch/4gvhxKA
They did not "train" a model for $50.
They took an already-trained model (Qwen2.5) funded by a massive corporation (Alibaba) that cost tens-to-hundreds of millions of dollars and nudged it to do slightly better in a single domain.
Would you do anything economically with that much cash to burn?
Could you?
Would you do anything economically with that much cash to burn?
Could you?